Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#3459 - All atom attributes should be displayed as SMARTS if at least one purely SMARTS attribute exists #3465

Conversation

AKZhuk
Copy link
Collaborator

@AKZhuk AKZhuk commented Oct 19, 2023

How the feature works? / How did you fix the issue?

Screen.Recording.2023-10-19.at.10.53.21.mov

Check list

  • unit-tests written
  • e2e-tests written
  • documentation updated
  • PR name follows the pattern #1234 – issue name
  • branch name doesn't contain '#'
  • PR is linked with the issue
  • base branch (master or release/xx) is correct
  • task status changed to "Code review"
  • reviewers are notified about the pull request

@AKZhuk AKZhuk changed the title #3459 - All atom attributes should be displayed as SMARTS if at least… #3459 - All atom attributes should be displayed as SMARTS if at least one purely SMARTS attribute exists Oct 19, 2023
… one purely SMARTS attribute exists

- Update e2e snapshots
… one purely SMARTS attribute exists

- Fix isotope position in custom Query
… one purely SMARTS attribute exists

- Fix failed tests
… one purely SMARTS attribute exists

- Fix issue with smarts preview and  template preview
- Fix failed test
… one purely SMARTS attribute exists

- Update logic for aromaticity property
- Update snapshots
@AKZhuk AKZhuk force-pushed the 3459-all-atom-attributes-should-be-displayed-as-smarts-if-at-least-one-purely-smarts-attribute-exists branch from b0abfaa to 047c464 Compare October 20, 2023 11:16
@AKZhuk AKZhuk changed the base branch from release/smarts-enhancement to release/2.16 October 20, 2023 15:52
@Nitvex Nitvex merged commit f00faa6 into release/2.16 Oct 23, 2023
3 checks passed
@Nitvex Nitvex deleted the 3459-all-atom-attributes-should-be-displayed-as-smarts-if-at-least-one-purely-smarts-attribute-exists branch October 23, 2023 11:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment