Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(marshal): Update to latest agreed ocapn terminology #1988

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 19, 2024

Conversation

erights
Copy link
Contributor

@erights erights commented Jan 19, 2024

closes: #XXXX
refs: #XXXX

Description

Upgrade the smallcaps cheatsheet's "OCapn name" column to use the latest agreed OCapN names.

Attn @cwebber @tsyesika @jar398

Security Considerations

none

Scaling Considerations

none

Documentation Considerations

This PR itself doesn't change the first column "Passable value" of the names we normally use when we're not speaking to OCapN interoperability, so none there.

OCapN connected discussions have largely already moved to the new terminology, so this is mostly catchup.

Testing Considerations

none

Upgrade Considerations

none

@erights erights self-assigned this Jan 19, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@dckc dckc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know what document is supposed to represent "latest agreed ocapn terminology".

The one I checked doesn't match in at least 1 case.

@erights erights requested a review from dckc January 19, 2024 22:45
Copy link
Contributor

@dckc dckc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

seems to match

@erights erights merged commit bc47a24 into master Jan 19, 2024
14 checks passed
@erights erights deleted the markm-update-smallcaps-cheatsheet branch January 19, 2024 23:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants