Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initial support for multiple LLVM versions #11639

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

sbc100
Copy link
Collaborator

@sbc100 sbc100 commented Jul 15, 2020

See #11362

@sbc100 sbc100 requested a review from kripken July 15, 2020 15:54
Copy link
Member

@kripken kripken left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The idea seems good, but without CI testing of 11, should we perhaps land this PR with all the future support ready, but not actually allow 11 atm?

@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ See docs/process.md for how version tagging works.

Current Trunk
-------------
- A simultaneous support for both llvm 12.0 (tot) and llvm 11.0 (soon to be
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
- A simultaneous support for both llvm 12.0 (tot) and llvm 11.0 (soon to be
- Simultaneous support for both llvm 12.0 (tot) and llvm 11.0 (soon to be

@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ See docs/process.md for how version tagging works.

Current Trunk
-------------
- A simultaneous support for both llvm 12.0 (tot) and llvm 11.0 (soon to be
stable). See https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/11362
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
stable). See https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/11362
stable). #11362

@@ -412,31 +412,29 @@ def fix_js_engine(old, new):
return new


def expected_llvm_version():
def supported_llvm_versions():
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

perhaps a comment that they must be in order (as the callers seem to depend on that)?

else:
return "6.0"
return ("6.0")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe ' here like above, or both with "?

@sbc100
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sbc100 commented Jul 15, 2020

How about we issue a different warning... I try an come up with one.

@sbc100
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sbc100 commented Jul 15, 2020

Putting this on hold for a while.

@sbc100 sbc100 closed this Jul 15, 2020
@sbc100 sbc100 deleted the support_multiple_llvm_versions branch March 7, 2023 19:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants