-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add get field mappings to High Level REST API Client #31423
Merged
vladimirdolzhenko
merged 17 commits into
elastic:master
from
vladimirdolzhenko:get_field_mappings_hlrestapi
Jun 23, 2018
Merged
Changes from 12 commits
Commits
Show all changes
17 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1730875
Add get field mappings to High Level REST API Client
b350c33
don't introduce ParseField in XContentBuilder so far
4cb66ae
don't introduce complex endpoint method; improve fields randomization…
207a8d5
rename getFieldMappings to getFieldMapping for consistency with REST …
f095c57
simplification of GetFieldMappingsResponse.fromXContent + allow rando…
ce482f1
add missed doc section for get-field-mapping-request-local
2205664
clean up
88192e8
use regexp in getRandomFieldsExcludeFilter
e38c145
add and use setRandomLocal(Consumer)
a7403ed
rebuilt fromXContent
b6265f7
Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/origin/master' into get_field_m…
a12c32e
polish a bit randomFieldsExcludeFilter regexp
3424790
drop unnecessary assertThat-s
03b0396
drop intermediate builder from fromXContent process
c991dbc
unused import...
fa77332
another round of fromXContent simplification
7d61d23
improve junk protection on parsing
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we need these assertions here? given that this test is added to test the docs snippets, I would avoid testing the functionality itself.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
agree
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is still here?