Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add logsdb release highlight #118559

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

martijnvg
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-storage-engine (Team:StorageEngine)

@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @martijnvg, I've created a changelog YAML for you. Note that since this PR is labelled release highlight, you need to update the changelog YAML to fill out the extended information sections.

@martijnvg martijnvg merged commit cdff361 into elastic:8.17 Dec 12, 2024
5 checks passed
Copy link

@tylerperk tylerperk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for getting this in quickly. I do have a few changes I'd like to see on the final page. Thanks

type: feature
issues: []
highlight:
title: Make logsdb general available

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

title: Logsdb index mode is Generally Available

highlight:
title: Make logsdb general available
body: >-
Logsdb has been GA-ed. Logsdb is a feature that allows Elasticsearch to store logs more efficiently.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggested body: Logsdb index mode has been GA-ed. Logsdb mode enables Elasticsearch to store logs more efficiently. Logsdb can reduce storage usage up to ~3 times compared to storing logs in Elasticsearch without Logsdb.

sarog pushed a commit to sarog/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants