Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove obsolete "Treating the CommonName field on X.509 certificates as a host name..." warning #178

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 22, 2024

Conversation

cmacknz
Copy link
Member

@cmacknz cmacknz commented Jan 16, 2024

We have an unconditional warning for "Treating the CommonName field on X.509 certificates as a host name when no Subject Alternative Names are present is going to be removed."

This deprecation was done in Go 1.15.0 and we are many releases past 8.0.0. This warning can now be removed, it is just adding log noise.

@cmacknz cmacknz added the Team:Elastic-Agent Label for the Agent team label Jan 16, 2024
@cmacknz cmacknz self-assigned this Jan 16, 2024
@cmacknz cmacknz requested a review from a team as a code owner January 16, 2024 18:21
@cmacknz cmacknz requested review from ycombinator and fearful-symmetry and removed request for a team January 16, 2024 18:21
@cmacknz cmacknz enabled auto-merge (squash) January 16, 2024 18:30
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

💚 Build Succeeded

History

cc @cmacknz

@cmacknz cmacknz changed the title Remove obsolete "reating the CommonName field on X.509 certificates as a host name..." warning Remove obsolete "Treating the CommonName field on X.509 certificates as a host name..." warning Jan 17, 2024
@cmacknz cmacknz requested a review from belimawr January 18, 2024 19:49
@cmacknz cmacknz merged commit 0d9656d into elastic:main Jan 22, 2024
6 checks passed
@cmacknz cmacknz deleted the remove-obsolete-deprecation branch January 22, 2024 14:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Team:Elastic-Agent Label for the Agent team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants