Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[New Rule] Suspicious Usage of bpf_probe_write_user Helper #4426

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 29, 2025

Conversation

Aegrah
Copy link
Contributor

@Aegrah Aegrah commented Jan 28, 2025

Summary

This rule monitors the syslog log file for messages related to instances of a program using the bpf_probe_write_user helper. The bpf_probe_write_user helper is used to write data to user space from a BPF program. Unauthorized use of this helper can be indicative of an eBPF rootkit or other malicious activity.

Copy link
Contributor

Rule: New - Guidelines

These guidelines serve as a reminder set of considerations when proposing a new rule.

Documentation and Context

  • Detailed description of the rule.
  • List any new fields required in ECS/data sources.
  • Link related issues or PRs.
  • Include references.

Rule Metadata Checks

  • creation_date matches the date of creation PR initially merged.
  • min_stack_version should support the widest stack versions.
  • name and description should be descriptive and not include typos.
  • query should be inclusive, not overly exclusive, considering performance for diverse environments. Non ecs fields should be added to non-ecs-schema.json if not available in an integration.
  • min_stack_comments and min_stack_version should be included if the rule is only compatible starting from a specific stack version.
  • index pattern should be neither too specific nor too vague, ensuring it accurately matches the relevant data stream (e.g., use logs-endpoint.process-* for process data).
  • integration should align with the index. If the integration is newly introduced, ensure the manifest, schemas, and new_rule.yaml template are updated.
  • setup should include the necessary steps to configure the integration.
  • note should include any additional information (e.g. Triage and analysis investigation guides, timeline templates).
  • tags should be relevant to the threat and align/added to the EXPECTED_RULE_TAGS in the definitions.py file.
  • threat, techniques, and subtechniques should map to ATT&CK always if possible.

New BBR Rules

  • building_block_type should be included if the rule is a building block and the rule should be located in the rules_building_block folder.
  • bypass_bbr_timing should be included if adding custom lookback timing to the rule.

Testing and Validation

  • Provide evidence of testing and detecting the expected threat.
  • Check for existence of coverage to prevent duplication.

@Aegrah
Copy link
Contributor Author

Aegrah commented Jan 28, 2025

Leaving this open until I know whether I should be adding an IG manually, or this is done via CI|CD.

@shashank-elastic
Copy link
Contributor

@Aegrah As far as i know, the CI/CD is not integrated directly in this repo. Will share the details directly

Copy link
Contributor

@shashank-elastic shashank-elastic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Amazing Guide Generation :)

@Aegrah Aegrah merged commit 18dd9cb into main Jan 29, 2025
9 checks passed
@Aegrah Aegrah deleted the ebpf-rootkit-installed branch January 29, 2025 10:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants