Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add operator election support #3632
Add operator election support #3632
Changes from 7 commits
651d58d
315ea0f
70f07da
58c05be
5ed2035
49d1077
f005b7d
72cca80
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if it is possible to deploy multiple independent instances of the operator, responsible for different namespaces or sets of namespaces via OLM that would all run in the
operators
namespace by default IIRC which would then all try to use the sameConfigMap
. Is this possible or are there additional safeguards in place in the leader election algorithm, e.g. some form of unique identifier per operator id. If not, should we try to include the operator UUID as an ID to prevent that?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 I think it's a good argument for making the leader election config map name configurable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we support multiple operators in the same namespace today, but you're right there's an argument that we should and maybe we should start here. Off the top of my head we need to make this variable: