Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fixed HCMPRE-1128 , 1082 #1722

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2024
Merged

fixed HCMPRE-1128 , 1082 #1722

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2024

Conversation

Bhavya-egov
Copy link
Contributor

@Bhavya-egov Bhavya-egov commented Nov 4, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced boundary selection logic based on uploaded files, improving user experience.
    • Added a new state management for selection restrictions, providing clearer control over selection behavior.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Resolved issues with pop-up visibility and boundary updates, ensuring smoother interactions.
  • Documentation

    • Updated campaign configuration to align naming conventions for better clarity in campaign searches.

@Bhavya-egov Bhavya-egov requested a review from a team as a code owner November 4, 2024 06:19
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 4, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on enhancing the state management and logic of the SelectingBoundariesDuplicate and SelectingBoundaryComponent components in the campaign manager module. Key modifications include the introduction of a restrictSelection state to manage selection restrictions based on uploaded files, the removal of certain states and functions, and updates to the props and state management in the SelectingBoundaryComponent. Additionally, the configuration for campaign types has been adjusted to ensure consistency in naming conventions.

Changes

File Change Summary
.../SelectingBoundariesDuplicate.js Removed showPopUp and updateBoundary states; introduced restrictSelection state; updated onSelect logic. Removed checkDataPresent function.
.../SelectingBoundaryComponent.js Updated Wrapper to include restrictSelection prop; renamed restrictSelection to restrictSelectionPage. Adjusted state management and onSelect function.
.../myCampaignConfig.js Updated defaultValues keys in sections.search.uiConfig for campaign types to campaignName and campaignType.

Possibly related PRs

  • Vertical stepper implemenetation #1441: The changes in SelectingBoundaryComponent.js regarding the restrictSelection state may relate to the overall state management improvements in the main PR's SelectingBoundariesDuplicate.js.
  • fixed summary and campaign creation #1479: The modifications in CampaignSummary.js and DeliveryDetailsSummary.js involve updates to state management and data handling, which could connect to the changes in boundary selection logic in the main PR.
  • updated summary redirection #1488: The updates in BoundarySummary.js and CampaignSummary.js include the introduction of hierarchyType, which may relate to the boundary selection logic in the main PR.
  • added heading to the popup #1526: The changes in BoundaryDetailsSummary.js regarding dynamic heading updates could be relevant to the boundary selection context in the main PR.
  • added condition for update #1541: The modifications in UpdateBoundary.js that enhance validation logic for boundary data could relate to the boundary selection logic in the main PR.
  • fixed NA issue of summary #1681: The updates in SetupCampaign.js that involve restructuring data and validation could connect to the overall improvements in boundary selection and management in the main PR.

Suggested reviewers

  • jagankumar-egov

🐇 In the fields where boundaries play,
A new state emerges, bright as day.
With selections clear and logic refined,
Our campaign paths are now aligned.
Hop along, let’s celebrate this change,
For clarity and ease, we’ll rearrange! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@jagankumar-egov jagankumar-egov merged commit 94932a9 into console Nov 4, 2024
3 checks passed
@jagankumar-egov jagankumar-egov deleted the HCMPRE-1128 branch November 4, 2024 06:21
@nabeelmd-eGov nabeelmd-eGov mentioned this pull request Dec 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants