Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

changed the name of popup #1643

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2024
Merged

changed the name of popup #1643

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2024

Conversation

Bhavya-egov
Copy link
Contributor

@Bhavya-egov Bhavya-egov commented Oct 23, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced dynamic download labels for improved context awareness.
    • Added toast notifications for better user feedback during uploads.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced error handling with more descriptive validation messages for uploaded data.
  • Improvements

    • Optimized state management and validation processes for better responsiveness and user experience.

@Bhavya-egov Bhavya-egov requested a review from a team as a code owner October 23, 2024 09:47
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 23, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The UploadData component in UploadData.js has been significantly updated to improve file upload functionality and validation processes. Key changes include the addition of a dynamic download label method, refined error handling with more descriptive messages, optimized state management using useEffect, and adjustments to modal behavior. These modifications enhance user interaction and ensure accurate data processing based on selected types.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/components/UploadData.js - Added getDownloadLabel() method for dynamic download label.
- Improved error handling and validation logic with more descriptive messages.
- Optimized useEffect hooks for better state management.
- Adjusted showPopUp state handling for modal behavior.
- Minor logic adjustments for data upload based on selected type.

Possibly related PRs

  • removed validation for old target #1626: The changes in the UploadData component are directly related to the main PR as both involve enhancements to file upload validation and error handling processes, specifically focusing on improving user feedback and validation logic.

Suggested reviewers

  • jagankumar-egov

Poem

🐇 In the meadow where data flows,
A rabbit hops where the upload goes.
With labels that change and errors that clear,
User feedback now brings us cheer!
So let’s validate with a joyful dance,
For every upload, we’ll take a chance! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range comments (4)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/components/UploadData.js (4)

Line range hint 65-65: Inconsistent naming convention: Use setProjectType instead of setprojectType

The setter function for the projectType state variable should follow camelCase naming conventions. Please rename setprojectType to setProjectType for consistency and readability.

Apply this diff to correct the function name:

-const [projectType , setprojectType] = useState(props?.props?.projectType)
+const [projectType, setProjectType] = useState(props?.props?.projectType)

Line range hint 100-107: Logical error in onStepClick: Inconsistent currentStep handling

The onStepClick function increments currentStep before evaluating conditions, which may lead to off-by-one errors. Additionally, the condition for currentStep === 2 is missing, and the key setting logic appears inconsistent.

Consider revising the function as follows:

const onStepClick = (currentStep) => {
+  const newStep = currentStep + 1;
+  setCurrentStep(newStep);
-  setCurrentStep(currentStep+1);
-  if(currentStep === 0){
+  if(newStep === 1){
    setKey(10);
  }
-  else if(currentStep === 1){
+  else if(newStep === 2){
    setKey(11);
  }
-  else if(currentStep === 3){
+  else if(newStep === 4){
    setKey(13);
  }
+  else if(newStep === 3){
+    setKey(12);
+  }
  else {
    // Handle other cases or set a default key if necessary
  }
};

This ensures that the incremented step is used in the conditions and includes the missing condition for currentStep === 2.


Line range hint 66-66: Avoid magic numbers: Define baseKey as a constant with a descriptive name

Using magic numbers like 10 can make the code harder to understand and maintain. Consider defining baseKey as a named constant at the top of the file or in a configuration file.

For example:

const BASE_KEY = 10;

And update the usage accordingly.


Line range hint 67-67: Remove commented-out code

The commented-out line // const projectType = props?.props?.projectType; seems unnecessary. Removing unused code helps keep the codebase clean and maintainable.

Apply this diff to remove the commented code:

-// const projectType = props?.props?.projectType;
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a9a655f and 28a39f4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/components/UploadData.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/components/UploadData.js (1)

Pattern **/*.js: check

🔇 Additional comments (2)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/components/UploadData.js (2)

Line range hint 70-72: Update references to the renamed setter function

After renaming setprojectType to setProjectType, ensure all occurrences are updated to prevent runtime errors.

Apply this diff to update the usage:

-useEffect(() =>{
-  setprojectType(props?.props?.projectType);
+useEffect(() => {
+  setProjectType(props?.props?.projectType);
 }, [props?.props?.projectType])

1195-1198: Dynamic label implementation is appropriate

Using getDownloadLabel() to set the button label enhances flexibility and ensures the correct label is displayed based on context. This improves user experience by providing accurate labels.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants