Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: adjust process worker documentation #383

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 14, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Phil91
Copy link
Member

@Phil91 Phil91 commented Aug 9, 2024

Description

adjust process worker documentation

Why

to be able to get a better understanding of the processes

Issue

Refs: #351

Checklist

  • I have followed the contributing guidelines
  • I have performed IP checks for added or updated 3rd party libraries
  • I have created and linked IP issues or requested their creation by a committer
  • I have added copyright and license headers, footers (for .md files) or files (for images)
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have successfully tested my changes locally
  • I have added tests that prove my changes work
  • I have checked that new and existing tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas

@@ -49,78 +51,115 @@ flowchart TD

The process worker communicates with the dim middle layer to create the wallet, or if disabled with the miw to create the wallet. It further more communicates with the bpdm, clearinghouse, the sd factory, the ssi-credential-issuer, keycloak, bpn did resolver and an universal resolver.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could you please uppercase DIM in all place and explain what the abbreviation means once in the this file and also once in the dim_user_creation.md

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've adjusted the pronunciation and added the explanation for the abbreviation.

Copy link

@Phil91 Phil91 requested a review from evegufy August 12, 2024 06:58
@Phil91 Phil91 mentioned this pull request Aug 14, 2024
9 tasks
@Phil91 Phil91 merged commit 58b2662 into main Aug 14, 2024
6 checks passed
@Phil91 Phil91 deleted the docs/351-process-worker branch August 14, 2024 06:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: USER READY
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants