Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Final prep for milestone 1 #5355

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 4, 2019
Merged

Conversation

SueChaplain
Copy link
Contributor

Add jstack (8,11,12) and jps (8,11) to complete
all content ready at MS1.

Signed-off-by: Sue Chaplain sue_chaplain@uk.ibm.com

Add jstack (8,11,12) and jps (8,11) to complete
all content ready at MS1.

Signed-off-by: Sue Chaplain <sue_chaplain@uk.ibm.com>
@SueChaplain
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pshipton I'm out until after MS1, so if there are any other changes needed these will have to be done on top of my merge, or in a separate PR.

<td valign="top">Ability to obtain Java stack traces and thread information for processes.</td>
</tr>

<tr><td valign="top"><a href="https://github.com/eclipse/openj9/issues/4655">#4655</a></td>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be #4650, although #4655 does lead to it.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Although everything else is an issue and not a PR. I was going to change it, but I think I'll just leave it be.

@pshipton pshipton merged commit 8a01c2b into eclipse-openj9:master Apr 4, 2019
@pdbain-ibm
Copy link
Contributor

Nit: inconsistent formatting:
New Java stack (jstack) tool vs. New Java process status tool (jps).

@pshipton
Copy link
Member

pshipton commented Apr 5, 2019

Nit: inconsistent formatting:

@pdbain-ibm given #5355 (comment) , if you want this fixed, please create a PR with the changes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants