Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

cmdLineTester_jvmtitests_hcr_OSRG ta001 extended functional failure zLinux, pLinux, AIX, Win #2009

Closed
pshipton opened this issue May 29, 2018 · 11 comments
Closed

cmdLineTester_jvmtitests_hcr_OSRG ta001 extended functional failure zLinux, pLinux, AIX, Win #2009

pshipton opened this issue May 29, 2018 · 11 comments
Labels
prio:high test failure

Comments

@pshipton
Copy link
Member

pshipton commented May 29, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Test was recently added #1927

'''
Testing: ta001
Test start time: 2018/05/29 02:28:41 Eastern Standard Time
Running command: "/home/jenkins/jenkins-agent/workspace/Test-Extended-JDK8-linux_390-64_cmprssptrs/j2sdk-image/jre/bin/java" -Xcompressedrefs -Xcompressedrefs -Xgcpolicy:optthruput -Xdebug -Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket,address=8888,server=y,onthrow=no.pkg.foo,launch=echo -Xjit:enableOSR,enableOSROnGuardFailure,count=1,disableAsyncCompilation -Xdump -agentlib:jvmtitest=test:ta001 -cp "/home/jenkins/jenkins-agent/workspace/Test-Extended-JDK8-linux_390-64_cmprssptrs/openj9/test/TestConfig/scripts/testKitGen/../../../../jvmtest/functional/cmdLineTests/jvmtitests/jvmtitest.jar:/home/jenkins/jenkins-agent/workspace/Test-Extended-JDK8-linux_390-64_cmprssptrs/openj9/test/TestConfig/scripts/testKitGen/../../../../jvmtest/TestConfig/lib/asm-all.jar" com.ibm.jvmti.tests.util.TestRunner
Time spent starting: 1 milliseconds
Time spent executing: 59514 milliseconds
Test result: FAILED
Output from test:
[OUT] *** Testing [1/13]: testBCIUsingASM_InjectNPELogic
[OUT] Pre Replace: 1
[OUT] Expected NullPointerException received
[OUT] *** Test took 2905 milliseconds
[OUT] OK
[OUT]
[OUT] *** Testing [2/13]: testBCIUsingASM_InjectNewIFBlock
[OUT] Pre Replace result : 5
[OUT] Post Replace result : 1
[OUT] *** Test took 3797 milliseconds
[OUT] OK
[OUT]
[OUT] *** Testing [3/13]: testBCIUsingASM_InjectTryCatch_Level1_injectCatchAndThrowNewAIOBE
[OUT] Expected NullPointerException received
[OUT] Expected ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException received
[OUT] *** Test took 5337 milliseconds
[OUT] OK
[OUT]
[OUT] *** Testing [4/13]: testBCIUsingASM_InjectTryCatch_Level2_injectCatchAndThrowNewAIOBE_catchAIOBEAndThrowNewAE
[OUT] Expected NullPointerException received
[OUT] Expected ArithmeticException received
[OUT] *** Test took 3010 milliseconds
[OUT] OK
[OUT]
[OUT] *** Testing [5/13]: testBCIUsingASM_Inject_Dead_Code
[OUT] pre : 4
[OUT] Expected pre-transform result received
[OUT] post : 2
[OUT] Expected post-transform result received
[OUT] *** Test took 5078 milliseconds
[OUT] OK
[OUT]
[OUT] *** Testing [6/13]: testBCIUsingASM_inject_CatchWithSelfGOTO
[OUT] Expected pre-transform result received
[OUT] Jumping to beginning of current catch block
[OUT] Jumping to beginning of current catch block
[OUT] Jumping to beginning of current catch block
[OUT] Jumping to beginning of current catch block
[OUT] Jumping to beginning of current catch block
[OUT] Expected post-transform result received
[OUT] *** Test took 4277 milliseconds
[OUT] OK
[OUT]
[OUT] *** Testing [7/13]: testBCIUsingASM_inject_Loop2Loop_Jump
[OUT] Expected pre-transform result received
[OUT] Jumping to a different loop
[OUT] Expected post-transform result received
[OUT] *** Test took 4668 milliseconds
[OUT] OK
[OUT]
[OUT] *** Testing [8/13]: testBCIUsingASM_inject_ParallelCatchJump
[OUT] Expected pre-transform result received
[OUT] Expected post-transform result received
[OUT] *** Test took 2917 milliseconds
[OUT] OK
[OUT]
[OUT] *** Testing [9/13]: testBCIUsingASM_inject_Unclean_Return
[OUT] pre : 3
[OUT] Expected pre-transform result received
[OUT] post : 5
[OUT] Expected post-transform result received
[OUT] *** Test took 4232 milliseconds
[OUT] OK
[OUT]
[OUT] *** Testing [10/13]: testBCIUsingASM_inject_call_to_timer_method
[ERR] 06:29:40.760 0xfb700j9codertvm(j9ji.104 * ** ASSERTION FAILED ** at decomp.cpp:584: (((IDATA)pendingStackHeight >= 0))
[ERR] JVMDUMP039I Processing dump event "traceassert", detail "" at 2018/05/29 02:29:40 - please wait.
[ERR] JVMDUMP032I JVM requested System dump using '/home/jenkins/jenkins-agent/workspace/Test-Extended-JDK8-linux_390-64_cmprssptrs/openj9/test/functional/cmdLineTests/jvmtitests/core.20180529.022940.34511.0001.dmp' in response to an event
[ERR] JVMPORT030W /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern setting "|/usr/share/apport/apport %p %s %c %d %P" specifies that the core dump is to be piped to an external program. Attempting to rename either core or core.34576.
[ERR]
[ERR] JVMDUMP010I System dump written to /home/jenkins/jenkins-agent/workspace/Test-Extended-JDK8-linux_390-64_cmprssptrs/openj9/test/functional/cmdLineTests/jvmtitests/core.20180529.022940.34511.0001.dmp
[ERR] JVMDUMP032I JVM requested Java dump using '/home/jenkins/jenkins-agent/workspace/Test-Extended-JDK8-linux_390-64_cmprssptrs/openj9/test/functional/cmdLineTests/jvmtitests/javacore.20180529.022940.34511.0002.txt' in response to an event
[ERR] JVMDUMP010I Java dump written to /home/jenkins/jenkins-agent/workspace/Test-Extended-JDK8-linux_390-64_cmprssptrs/openj9/test/functional/cmdLineTests/jvmtitests/javacore.20180529.022940.34511.0002.txt
[ERR] JVMDUMP032I JVM requested Snap dump using '/home/jenkins/jenkins-agent/workspace/Test-Extended-JDK8-linux_390-64_cmprssptrs/openj9/test/functional/cmdLineTests/jvmtitests/Snap.20180529.022940.34511.0003.trc' in response to an event
[ERR] JVMDUMP010I Snap dump written to /home/jenkins/jenkins-agent/workspace/Test-Extended-JDK8-linux_390-64_cmprssptrs/openj9/test/functional/cmdLineTests/jvmtitests/Snap.20180529.022940.34511.0003.trc
[ERR] JVMDUMP013I Processed dump event "traceassert", detail "".

Success condition was not found: [Return code: 0]
'''
@pshipton pshipton changed the title cmdLineTester_jvmtitests_hcr_OSRG ta001 failure zLinux, pLinux cmdLineTester_jvmtitests_hcr_OSRG ta001 extended failure zLinux, pLinux May 29, 2018
@pshipton pshipton changed the title cmdLineTester_jvmtitests_hcr_OSRG ta001 extended failure zLinux, pLinux cmdLineTester_jvmtitests_hcr_OSRG ta001 extended functional failure zLinux, pLinux May 29, 2018
@pshipton pshipton changed the title cmdLineTester_jvmtitests_hcr_OSRG ta001 extended functional failure zLinux, pLinux cmdLineTester_jvmtitests_hcr_OSRG ta001 extended functional failure zLinux, pLinux, AIX May 31, 2018
@pshipton pshipton changed the title cmdLineTester_jvmtitests_hcr_OSRG ta001 extended functional failure zLinux, pLinux, AIX cmdLineTester_jvmtitests_hcr_OSRG ta001 extended functional failure zLinux, pLinux, AIX, Win Jun 1, 2018
@pshipton
Copy link
Member Author

pshipton commented Jun 1, 2018

I'll mark this as high priority (to at least exclude the test until fixed) since its often failing in the nightly builds, and likely in PR testing as well.

@llxia llxia mentioned this issue Jun 6, 2018
Merged
llxia added a commit to llxia/openj9 that referenced this issue Jun 7, 2018
@llxia
Temporarily exclude cmdLineTester_jvmtitests_hcr_OSRG_nongold_SE80
7e2c7ca 
[ci skip]

Issue: eclipse-openj9#2009

Signed-off-by: lanxia <lan_xia@ca.ibm.com>
@pshipton
Copy link
Member Author

pshipton commented Jun 8, 2018

The test is still failing, I don't think the exclude worked. The sha of the build 4d119ee being tested indicates the exclude is included (assuming the test material uses the same openj9 material as the build).

https://ci.eclipse.org/openj9/job/Test-Extended-JDK8-linux_ppc-64_cmprssptrs_le/181/
https://ci.eclipse.org/openj9/job/Test-Extended-JDK8-win_x86-64_cmprssptrs/16/
https://ci.eclipse.org/openj9/job/Test-Extended-JDK9-aix_ppc-64_cmprssptrs/86/

@smlambert
Copy link
Contributor

Odd that the PR test run passed if the exclude didn't work

@liqunl liqunl mentioned this issue Jun 8, 2018
Closed
@pshipton
Copy link
Member Author

pshipton commented Jun 8, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Odd that the PR test run passed if the exclude didn't work

The failure is intermittent.

@pdbain-ibm pdbain-ibm mentioned this issue Jun 8, 2018
Merged
@pshipton
Copy link
Member Author

@gacholio

@gacholio
Copy link
Contributor

Almost certainly a dup of #2139. Links are broken anyway.

@pshipton
Copy link
Member Author

@gacholio you could create a revert for #2099 and run PR testing

@gacholio
Copy link
Contributor

Since it's intermittent, that seems like a waste of time. Just unexclude it and we'll see what happens.

@gacholio
Copy link
Contributor

Unexcluded by #2487

@gacholio
Copy link
Contributor

Waiting for nightly build results to close.

@gacholio
Copy link
Contributor

Should be fixed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
prio:high test failure
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@smlambert @gacholio @pshipton