Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Power-specific relocation types needed for SVM AOT #3566

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2019

Conversation

aviansie-ben
Copy link
Contributor

For the Power codegen to work correctly with the newly implemented
Symbol Validation Manager for AOT, a couple new relocation types need to
be added:

  1. TR_DiscontiguousSymbolFromManager represents a discontiguous load
    sequence that needs to be relocated with a symbol from the SVM
  2. TR_ResolvedTrampolines represents the need to reserve a trampoline
    for a resolved method

Signed-off-by: Ben Thomas ben@benthomas.ca

For the Power codegen to work correctly with the newly implemented
Symbol Validation Manager for AOT, a couple new relocation types need to
be added:

1. TR_DiscontiguousSymbolFromManager represents a discontiguous load
   sequence that needs to be relocated with a symbol from the SVM
2. TR_ResolvedTrampolines represents the need to reserve a trampoline
   for a resolved method

Signed-off-by: Ben Thomas <ben@benthomas.ca>
@0xdaryl
Copy link
Contributor

0xdaryl commented Feb 14, 2019

Seems reasonable to me. @dsouzai, would you mind reviewing please?

@0xdaryl
Copy link
Contributor

0xdaryl commented Feb 14, 2019

@genie-omr build all

@0xdaryl 0xdaryl self-assigned this Feb 14, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@dsouzai dsouzai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@0xdaryl 0xdaryl merged commit 0590d62 into eclipse-omr:master Feb 14, 2019
@aviansie-ben aviansie-ben deleted the power-aot-new-relos branch February 15, 2019 15:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants