Package docker runner in Che #2
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
sunix
force-pushed
the
docker-runner
branch
2 times, most recently
from
2a0e629
to
3ec74fc
Compare
|
Is this PR is up to date? |
|
reworked as part of #21 |
benoitf
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2016
…ove InstanceKey #1 new docker recipe type currently we have type:"dockerfile", location: "http://path-to-recipe" now we could provide type:"dockerfile", content: "FROM codenvy/foo\nENV FLORENT=TRUE\" and type:"image", location or content: "codenvy/foo" #2 InstanceKey Up to now, InstanceKey was used to perform snapshot recovery. But machine source is a way to provide this information. So remove InstanceKey and replace it by MachineSource (and DockerMachineSource instead of DockerInstanceKey) InstanceProvider: void removeInstanceSnapshot(InstanceKey instanceKey) --> void removeInstanceSnapshot(MachineSource machineSource) Instance: InstanceKey saveToSnapshot(String owner) --> MachineSource saveToSnapshot(String owner) #3 InstanceProvider model To avoid also that MachineManager "knows" the inner type, the recipe handling is moved to the instance provider implementation And as the snapshot handling is with MachineSource (included in MachineConfig included in Machine), no need to give extra InstanceKey parameter Replace two previous methods Instance createInstance(Recipe recipe, Machine machine, LineConsumer creationLogsOutput) Instance createInstance(InstanceKey instanceKey, Machine machine, LineConsumer creationLogsOutput) throws NotFoundException, InvalidInstanceSnapshotException, MachineException; by only one: createInstance(Machine machine, LineConsumer creationLogsOutput) Change-Id: Ia7ea97bc1a44059b4892f5db387f54f2e1709fa3 Signed-off-by: Florent BENOIT <fbenoit@codenvy.com>
benoitf
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 29, 2016
…ove InstanceKey #1 new docker recipe type currently we have type:"dockerfile", location: "http://path-to-recipe" now we could provide type:"dockerfile", content: "FROM codenvy/foo\nENV FLORENT=TRUE\" and type:"image", location or content: "codenvy/foo" #2 InstanceKey Up to now, InstanceKey was used to perform snapshot recovery. But machine source is a way to provide this information. So remove InstanceKey and replace it by MachineSource (and DockerMachineSource instead of DockerInstanceKey) InstanceProvider: void removeInstanceSnapshot(InstanceKey instanceKey) --> void removeInstanceSnapshot(MachineSource machineSource) Instance: InstanceKey saveToSnapshot(String owner) --> MachineSource saveToSnapshot(String owner) #3 InstanceProvider model To avoid also that MachineManager "knows" the inner type, the recipe handling is moved to the instance provider implementation And as the snapshot handling is with MachineSource (included in MachineConfig included in Machine), no need to give extra InstanceKey parameter Replace two previous methods Instance createInstance(Recipe recipe, Machine machine, LineConsumer creationLogsOutput) Instance createInstance(InstanceKey instanceKey, Machine machine, LineConsumer creationLogsOutput) throws NotFoundException, InvalidInstanceSnapshotException, MachineException; by only one: createInstance(Machine machine, LineConsumer creationLogsOutput) Change-Id: Ia7ea97bc1a44059b4892f5db387f54f2e1709fa3 Signed-off-by: Florent BENOIT <fbenoit@codenvy.com>
benoitf
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2016
…ove InstanceKey #1 new docker recipe type currently we have type:"dockerfile", location: "http://path-to-recipe" now we could provide type:"dockerfile", content: "FROM codenvy/foo\nENV FLORENT=TRUE\" and type:"image", location or content: "codenvy/foo" #2 InstanceKey Up to now, InstanceKey was used to perform snapshot recovery. But machine source is a way to provide this information. So remove InstanceKey and replace it by MachineSource (and DockerMachineSource instead of DockerInstanceKey) InstanceProvider: void removeInstanceSnapshot(InstanceKey instanceKey) --> void removeInstanceSnapshot(MachineSource machineSource) Instance: InstanceKey saveToSnapshot(String owner) --> MachineSource saveToSnapshot(String owner) #3 InstanceProvider model To avoid also that MachineManager "knows" the inner type, the recipe handling is moved to the instance provider implementation And as the snapshot handling is with MachineSource (included in MachineConfig included in Machine), no need to give extra InstanceKey parameter Replace two previous methods Instance createInstance(Recipe recipe, Machine machine, LineConsumer creationLogsOutput) Instance createInstance(InstanceKey instanceKey, Machine machine, LineConsumer creationLogsOutput) throws NotFoundException, InvalidInstanceSnapshotException, MachineException; by only one: createInstance(Machine machine, LineConsumer creationLogsOutput) Change-Id: Ia7ea97bc1a44059b4892f5db387f54f2e1709fa3 Signed-off-by: Florent BENOIT <fbenoit@codenvy.com>
benoitf
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2016
…ove InstanceKey #1 new docker recipe type currently we have type:"dockerfile", location: "http://path-to-recipe" now we could provide type:"dockerfile", content: "FROM codenvy/foo\nENV FLORENT=TRUE\" and type:"image", location or content: "codenvy/foo" #2 InstanceKey Up to now, InstanceKey was used to perform snapshot recovery. But machine source is a way to provide this information. So remove InstanceKey and replace it by MachineSource (and DockerMachineSource instead of DockerInstanceKey) InstanceProvider: void removeInstanceSnapshot(InstanceKey instanceKey) --> void removeInstanceSnapshot(MachineSource machineSource) Instance: InstanceKey saveToSnapshot(String owner) --> MachineSource saveToSnapshot(String owner) #3 InstanceProvider model To avoid also that MachineManager "knows" the inner type, the recipe handling is moved to the instance provider implementation And as the snapshot handling is with MachineSource (included in MachineConfig included in Machine), no need to give extra InstanceKey parameter Replace two previous methods Instance createInstance(Recipe recipe, Machine machine, LineConsumer creationLogsOutput) Instance createInstance(InstanceKey instanceKey, Machine machine, LineConsumer creationLogsOutput) throws NotFoundException, InvalidInstanceSnapshotException, MachineException; by only one: createInstance(Machine machine, LineConsumer creationLogsOutput) Change-Id: Ia7ea97bc1a44059b4892f5db387f54f2e1709fa3 Signed-off-by: Florent BENOIT <fbenoit@codenvy.com>
benoitf
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2016
…ove InstanceKey #1 new docker recipe type currently we have type:"dockerfile", location: "http://path-to-recipe" now we could provide type:"dockerfile", content: "FROM codenvy/foo\nENV FLORENT=TRUE\" and type:"image", location or content: "codenvy/foo" #2 InstanceKey Up to now, InstanceKey was used to perform snapshot recovery. But machine source is a way to provide this information. So remove InstanceKey and replace it by MachineSource (and DockerMachineSource instead of DockerInstanceKey) InstanceProvider: void removeInstanceSnapshot(InstanceKey instanceKey) --> void removeInstanceSnapshot(MachineSource machineSource) Instance: InstanceKey saveToSnapshot(String owner) --> MachineSource saveToSnapshot(String owner) #3 InstanceProvider model To avoid also that MachineManager "knows" the inner type, the recipe handling is moved to the instance provider implementation And as the snapshot handling is with MachineSource (included in MachineConfig included in Machine), no need to give extra InstanceKey parameter Replace two previous methods Instance createInstance(Recipe recipe, Machine machine, LineConsumer creationLogsOutput) Instance createInstance(InstanceKey instanceKey, Machine machine, LineConsumer creationLogsOutput) throws NotFoundException, InvalidInstanceSnapshotException, MachineException; by only one: createInstance(Machine machine, LineConsumer creationLogsOutput) Change-Id: Ia7ea97bc1a44059b4892f5db387f54f2e1709fa3 Signed-off-by: Florent BENOIT <fbenoit@codenvy.com>
ghost
mentioned this pull request
1 task
akurinnoy
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 15, 2016
ghost
mentioned this pull request
mkuznyetsov
referenced
this pull request
in mkuznyetsov/che
Aug 9, 2017
Fix copyright/license headers of resources
4 tasks
mshaposhnik
referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2019
Signed-off-by: Max Shaposhnik <mshaposh@redhat.com>
ghost
mentioned this pull request
johnmcollier
pushed a commit
to johnmcollier/che
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2019
Add role binding for codewind
3 tasks
5 tasks
rhopp
referenced
this pull request
in rhopp/che
Nov 26, 2020
Signed-off-by: Radim Hopp <rhopp@redhat.com>
23 tasks
ghost
mentioned this pull request
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
to be tested with codenvy-legacy/che-plugins#72
also, 3552257 needs to be disable to have the right runner panel