Add note clarifying that the kubernetes image puller operator is comm… #627
Conversation
tomgeorge
requested review from
davidfestal,
nickboldt and
tolusha
as code owners
|
/retest |
1 similar comment
|
/retest |
|
Just to check, this will be disabled by default as shown in the screenshot? The user will have to choose to enable it - correct? |
|
@sympatheticmoose that's correct |
|
I've updated nightly bundle. For some reasons check passed but files weren't up to date. |
|
Also I've removed empty line in a comment. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: davidfestal, ibuziuk, nickboldt, tolusha, tomgeorge The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
tomgeorge
force-pushed
the
update-kubernetesimagepuller-community-support
branch
from
86ffc28
to
2940c61
Compare
…unity-supported Signed-off-by: Tom George <tgeorge@redhat.com>
tomgeorge
force-pushed
the
update-kubernetesimagepuller-community-support
branch
from
2940c61
to
48427f3
Compare
|
/retest |
|
/retest |
1 similar comment
|
/retest |
…unity-supported
Signed-off-by: Tom George tgeorge@redhat.com
What does this PR do?
As part of the discussions around how to best add the kubernetes image puller into the che-operator[1], this PR adds a note that the image puller is considered community supported.
[1] See:
eclipse-che/che#18569
eclipse-che/che#18133
#541
Screenshot/screencast of this PR
What issues does this PR fix or reference?
eclipse-che/che#18569
eclipse-che/che#18133
#541
How to test this PR?
PR Checklist
As the author of this Pull Request I made sure that:
What issues does this PR fix or referenceandHow to test this PRcompletedReviewers
Reviewers, please comment how you tested the PR when approving it.