-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 203
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix import of multiple easyblocks #3791
Fix import of multiple easyblocks #3791
Conversation
@Flamefire: Tests failed in GitHub Actions, see https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-framework/actions/runs/1082638830
bleep, bloop, I'm just a bot (boegelbot v20200716.01) |
Honor priority: PR EBs before standard EBs and add test and fix for it as suggested by @migueldiascosta
Use EB_GITHUB_TEST_ACCOUNT env variable to specify your personal account to use for tests. Useful to avoid rate limits
bf87587
to
adb6a0b
Compare
@Flamefire: Tests failed in GitHub Actions, see https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-framework/actions/runs/2998365230
bleep, bloop, I'm just a bot (boegelbot v20200716.01) |
adb6a0b
to
1ba3079
Compare
@Flamefire: Tests failed in GitHub Actions, see https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-framework/actions/runs/3000863860
bleep, bloop, I'm just a bot (boegelbot v20200716.01) |
@boegel Can we simply drop support for Python 3.5? It is EOL and unsupported by many tools. I also can't reproduce the CI failure locally but getting a Python 3.5 on a recent system is already hard as it requires OpenSSL 1.0 which is hard to come by |
Continuation of #3780 as fixing the issue with single PRs is much easier then messing with all this import stuff
Additionally fixes including easyblocks from multiple PRs and the manipulations of sys.path/modules/...