Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce golf: compiler toolchain with GCC, OpenBLAS, and FFTW. #2458

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2018

Conversation

bartoldeman
Copy link
Contributor

Since BLACS_MODULE_NAME and SCALAPACK_MODULE_NAME are set to None in
this case we need to filter out None for the toolchain definition.

Since BLACS_MODULE_NAME and SCALAPACK_MODULE_NAME are set to None in
this case we need to filter out None for the toolchain definition.
@bartoldeman
Copy link
Contributor Author

And so we are easily building a golf course...

I tested this locally with numpy and golf easyconfigs. Will submit PRs for those too.

bartoldeman added a commit to ComputeCanada/easybuild-easyconfigs that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2018
This Python is identical to Python-3.6.4-foss-2018a.eb except for
mpi4py, that is no MPI support. I did need to add some packages that
were downloaded previously though, that will be fixed in the foss
version too.

Depends on
easybuilders/easybuild-framework#2458
@boegel boegel added this to the 3.6.0 milestone Mar 31, 2018
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@boegel boegel merged commit 33df837 into easybuilders:develop Mar 31, 2018
rdbisme pushed a commit to rdbisme/easybuild-easyconfigs that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2018
This Python is identical to Python-3.6.4-foss-2018a.eb except for
mpi4py, that is no MPI support. I did need to add some packages that
were downloaded previously though, that will be fixed in the foss
version too.

Depends on
easybuilders/easybuild-framework#2458
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants