{vis}[foss/2016a] PyBERT 1.7.9 w/Python-3.5.1 (WIP) #3446
Conversation
hajgato
changed the title
| toolchain = {'name': 'foss', 'version': '2016a'} | ||
|
|
||
| source_urls = ['https://github.com/enthought/chaco/archive/'] | ||
| sources = ['%s.tar.gz' % commit_id] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@hajgato 4.5.0 is the latest official release, why not use that?
Once we start diverging from official releases, we'll need to stick to it forever, since 20160817 will always be newer than 4.5.0 or any other newer version...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@boegel I had two options. Try to do everything with Python3, as the user want to use PyBERT simultaneously with pyGIMLi. As far as I got from pyGIMLi homepage, its requires Python3. So I had to use Python3 here as well. and the latest official release is not yet Python3 compatible. I could use version4.6.0beta.20160817 (or whatever is the version claimed by the code).
Other possibility to make a Python2/2.7.11-Python-3.5.1, and use all the stuff here with that.
(chaco/4.5.0-foss-2016a-Python-2.7.11-Python-3.5.1 or so). The option to use system Python is not a good way, since PyBERT requires Python 2.7
There was a problem hiding this comment.
according to http://www.pygimli.org/installation.html#optional-prerequisites, pyGIMLi is compatible with Python 2.7 as well?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
also, I'm not sure what Python2/2.7.11-Python-3.5.1 is? is that Python 2 and 3 combined? that's a nice recipe for disaster ;)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ok, for the future what is the recipe to use python2 and python3 together. Ok, in this project it is not needed, but if in the future this problem will pop up? If I have a linux distro, I can have both, and most of the cases its not a disaster.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think the right approach would be to make a Python2/2.7.11-* module, and load Python (3) and Python2 together as deps
There was a problem hiding this comment.
How do you prevent users to load python (2) and python2 module together? I think that's also a recipe for disaster (for example which order did they loaded it)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nothing would break then, one module would just shadow the other?
hajgato
changed the title
|
@boegel I can confirm that PyBERT does not work (prblem with the matplotlib interface) |
|
@boegel: Ok, I found the error, it needs an old version of |
|
@boegel: I put this back as |
|
Python2 version will be made. |
No description provided.