Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{tools}[system/system] EasyBuild v4.9.2 #20801

Merged

Conversation

boegel
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel commented Jun 12, 2024

(created using eb --new-pr)

Note: to install EasyBuild v4.9.2 using --from-pr 20801, you will need to use an EasyBuild version that includes the changes from:

When using EasyBuild v4.9.1 (or v4.9.2) or earlier, you will also need to use --include-easyblocks-from-pr 3358.

@boegel boegel added the update label Jun 12, 2024
@boegel boegel added this to the release after 4.9.2 milestone Jun 12, 2024
@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Jun 12, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 3358"

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Jun 12, 2024

Test report by @boegel
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3358
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3111.skitty.os - Linux RHEL 8.8, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegel/f91e67e49ff58a4f406f9ee28a9112e5 for a full test report.

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=20801 EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 3358" EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20801 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 13719

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2162428260 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3358
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/6578af3b90c87f7d8e80226b3734b2c9 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Jun 12, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3
EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 3358"

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=20801 EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 3358" EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20801 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 4366

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2162449481 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3358
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.4, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/678acb447b91389828492901c16d231e for a full test report.

@ocaisa ocaisa merged commit bfc2938 into easybuilders:develop Jun 12, 2024
9 checks passed
@boegel boegel deleted the 20240612101333_new_pr_EasyBuild492 branch June 12, 2024 11:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants