{numlib}[foss/2023a] PETSc v3.20.3, SuperLU_DIST v8.1.2, ParMETIS v4.0.3

[furstj]

(created using eb --new-pr)

[furstj]

Requires easyblock from:

• remove trailing slash in PETSC_DIR set by custom easyblock for PETSc easybuild-easyblocks#3086

[boegel]

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 3086"

[boegelbot]

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=19686 EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 3086" EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_19686 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 12777

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1917873408 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegel]

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3
EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 3086"

[boegelbot]

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=19686 EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 3086" EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_19686 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 3525

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1917885629 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3086
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.3, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/6b1d9a281316980ab020659537b04fcb for a full test report.

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3086
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/98c67858967150fefda253c1890ff93c for a full test report.

[boegel]

lgtm

[maxim-masterov]

PETSc 3.20.3 is not tested against SuiteSparse 7.1.0. Is it a good idea to build against it?

[boegel]

PETSc 3.20.3 is not tested against SuiteSparse 7.1.0. Is it a good idea to build against it?

We're running the PETSc test suite (make test) as a part of the installation, and that didn't reveal any problems...

Where do you get the info that PETSc is not tested against SuiteSparse 7.1.0?

[maxim-masterov]

There is a warning in the installation logs, that's why I wonder if it's safe to use SuiteSparce v7:

=============================================================================================
                                     ***** WARNING *****
  Using version 7.1.0 of package SUITESPARSE, PETSc is tested with 5.13. Suggest using
  --download-suitesparse for a compatible SuiteSparse
=============================================================================================

[furstj]

As far as I remember, my first version was with SuiteSparse 5.13. But boegelbot complained that there is SuiteSparse 7.1.0 already in the dependencies.

In any case, the easybuild runs "make tests" and these tests call also SuiteSparse (try to look for the word "_umfpack" in build log).

[boegel]

Going in, thanks @furstj!