Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{devel}[GCCcore/13.2.0] Perl v5.38.0, Autoconf v2.71, Automake v1.16.5, ... #18703

Conversation

SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member

(created using eb --new-pr)

…ore-13.2.0.eb, Automake-1.16.5-GCCcore-13.2.0.eb, Autotools-20220317-GCCcore-13.2.0.eb, libtool-2.4.7-GCCcore-13.2.0.eb
@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member Author

Test report by @SebastianAchilles
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
zen2-ubuntu-2304 - Linux Ubuntu 23.04 (Lunar Lobster), x86_64, AMD EPYC 7452 32-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.11.4
See https://gist.github.com/SebastianAchilles/dd6d4aef948fc5a0c74f6a3fba1dc5d4 for a full test report.

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member Author

Test report by @SebastianAchilles
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
bwd-rockylinux-92 - Linux Rocky Linux 9.2 (Blue Onyx), x86_64, Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6900K CPU @ 3.20GHz (broadwell), 2 x NVIDIA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 535.54.03, Python 3.9.16
See https://gist.github.com/SebastianAchilles/ca3b646e4b5381b8c0c31da8b2b601cc for a full test report.

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member Author

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@SebastianAchilles: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster

PR test command 'EB_PR=18703 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --mem-per-cpu=4000M --job-name test_PR_18703 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen2.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 3302

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1704385335 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen2g1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/3d8847ebd2c19e03a028dc94564dd656 for a full test report.

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member Author

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@SebastianAchilles: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=18703 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_18703 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 11626

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1704392027 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/88721c237a6bef5208b8e7742019d450 for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

branfosj commented Sep 4, 2023

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 13 out of 13 (5 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0105u03a.bear.cluster - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8360Y CPU @ 2.40GHz (icelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/ec8b96ee39a49c313c471a73270b821e for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

branfosj commented Sep 4, 2023

Going in, thanks @SebastianAchilles!

@branfosj branfosj merged commit 49f0079 into easybuilders:develop Sep 4, 2023
@branfosj branfosj modified the milestones: 4.x, next release (4.8.1?) Sep 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants