Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{bio}[foss/2022a] cellpose-omni v0.6.5 #18321

Conversation

deniskristak
Copy link
Contributor

dep for vscentrum/vsc-software-stack#89
adding easyconfigs: cellpose-omni-0.6.5-foss-2022a.eb and patches: cellpose-omni-0.6.5_fix_deps_and_scm.patch

@deniskristak deniskristak changed the title cellpose-omni-0.6.5-foss-2022a.eb {bio}[foss/2022a] cellpose-omni v0.6.5 Jul 17, 2023
@verdurin
Copy link
Member

Test report by @verdurin
FAILED
Build succeeded for 2 out of 3 (1 easyconfigs in total)
easybuild-c7.novalocal - Linux CentOS Linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/verdurin/086078a270600eee65e4fa97f8ca6f80 for a full test report.

@verdurin
Copy link
Member

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@verdurin: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=18321 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_18321 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 11276

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1645707702 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/09be95f5009f4245983982c034e9ca2a for a full test report.

@deniskristak
Copy link
Contributor Author

this is not ready yet, in fact, i will have to update the version

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants