Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{devel}[GCCcore/12.2.0] Qt5 v5.15.7 #16810

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 9, 2022

Conversation

boegel
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel commented Dec 7, 2022

@boegel boegel added the update label Dec 7, 2022
@boegel boegel added this to the next release (4.7.0) milestone Dec 7, 2022
@easybuilders easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Dec 7, 2022
@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Dec 8, 2022

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
CORE_CNT=16

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=16810 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_16810 --ntasks="16" ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 9716

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1342420560 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
cnx1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v3 @ 2.60GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/abd8b46719b8eb63a97bca7f4f8627d6 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Dec 8, 2022

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
node3104.skitty.os - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz (skylake_avx512), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/c133066146a93166a7854eee19829263 for a full test report.

@easybuilders easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Dec 9, 2022
@branfosj
Copy link
Member

branfosj commented Dec 9, 2022

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2
CORE_CNT=16

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@branfosj: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster

PR test command 'EB_PR=16810 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --mem-per-cpu=4000M --job-name test_PR_16810 --ntasks="16" ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen2.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 1857

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1344339485 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (2 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen2g1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/e4304d92e1b2245bd78ba16e6c5e1d3d for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

branfosj commented Dec 9, 2022

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 14 out of 14 (2 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0105u36b.bear.cluster - Linux RHEL 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8360Y CPU @ 2.40GHz (icelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/d5d38703b9e19a36c751611d9ebe259b for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

branfosj commented Dec 9, 2022

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 14 out of 14 (2 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0211u03a.bear.cluster - Linux Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS (Focal Fossa), x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6248 CPU @ 2.50GHz (cascadelake), Python 3.8.5
See https://gist.github.com/dcfe535ec77cd89a65ce262f8923531d for a full test report.

@branfosj branfosj merged commit fa77418 into easybuilders:develop Dec 9, 2022
@boegel boegel deleted the 20221207095816_new_pr_Qt55157 branch December 10, 2022 07:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants