Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bump JasPer version to 2.0.24 in GDAL 3.2.1 easyconfig #12288

Merged

Conversation

branfosj
Copy link
Member

@branfosj branfosj commented Feb 25, 2021

(created using eb --new-pr)

#12277 and #12251 were merged around the same time. 12277 bumped 2020b to using JasPer 2.0.24 and deleted the old 2.0.14. 12251 added GDAL and that had a dep on the old JasPer.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member Author

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@branfosj: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=12288 EB_ARGS= /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_12288 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 16222

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 786109189 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegel boegel changed the title Fix JasPer version in GDAL after 12277 bump JasPer version to 2.0.24 in GDAL 3.2.1 easyconfig Feb 25, 2021
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Feb 25, 2021

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3152.skitty.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/0e082c55212bb3a58da7767f6a58d768 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Feb 25, 2021

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3521.doduo.os - Linux RHEL 8.2, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7552 48-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/f8989905738c43b5133fb41c0dac41cd for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member Author

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0211u03a.bear.cluster - Linux centos linux 7.8.2003, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6248 CPU @ 2.50GHz (cascadelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/e82737183162d89f11cc92814777d9b9 for a full test report.

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
generoso-c1-s-1 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/77516709220e99f01f117793f5610339 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Feb 25, 2021

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node2685.swalot.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/0a8c55db79b7b0d26b68d1de5b0459be for a full test report.

@verdurin
Copy link
Member

Test report by @verdurin
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (1 easyconfigs in total)
easybuild-c7.novalocal - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/8fba6949676677de7c41f38f6793c72d for a full test report.

@verdurin
Copy link
Member

Going in, thanks @branfosj!

@verdurin verdurin merged commit 196865e into easybuilders:develop Feb 25, 2021
@branfosj branfosj deleted the 20210225182247_new_pr_GDAL321 branch February 25, 2021 18:58
@verdurin
Copy link
Member

Test report by @verdurin
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (1 easyconfigs in total)
nuc.lan - Linux Fedora 32, x86_64, Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8650U CPU @ 1.90GHz, Python 3.8.7
See https://gist.github.com/a476f22208c85d867839ccd1f68c52c6 for a full test report.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants