Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{devel}[GCCcore/10.2.0] Bazel v3.7.2, flatbuffers v1.12.0, flatbuffers-python v1.12 w/ Python 3.8.6 #12148

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 13, 2021

Conversation

Flamefire
Copy link
Contributor

(created using eb --new-pr)

…-GCCcore-10.2.0.eb, flatbuffers-python-1.12-GCCcore-10.2.0.eb and patches: flatbuffers-1.12.0_replace-usage-of-memset.patch, flatbuffers-1.12.0_silence-str-op-false-positive.patch
@Flamefire
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @Flamefire
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 4 out of 4 (3 easyconfigs in total)
taurusa13 - Linux centos linux 7.7.1908, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2603 v4 @ 1.70GHz (broadwell), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/d2f608aea40daf0eff3b3a6c7217b6bd for a full test report.

@Flamefire
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @Flamefire
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 4 out of 4 (3 easyconfigs in total)
taurusml13 - Linux RHEL 7.6, POWER, 8335-GTX (power9le), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/639034db8c9dcbc79089f4f180e60d93 for a full test report.

@boegel boegel added the update label Feb 13, 2021
@boegel boegel added this to the next release (4.3.3?) milestone Feb 13, 2021
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Feb 13, 2021

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
CORE_CNT=16

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=12148 EB_ARGS= /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_12148 --ntasks="16" ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 13811

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 778621218 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Feb 13, 2021

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 4 out of 4 (3 easyconfigs in total)
node3507.doduo.os - Linux RHEL 8.2, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7552 48-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/55d210d79e592603be7f56a2cc80b5dd for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Feb 13, 2021

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 4 out of 4 (3 easyconfigs in total)
node3304.joltik.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6242 CPU @ 2.80GHz (cascadelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/67fcb718f0da3e5009b648de9cb9033b for a full test report.

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
generoso-x-1 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/5146866f46a4b90e91304c68d948dfac for a full test report.

boegel
boegel previously approved these changes Feb 13, 2021
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

…ble via separate flatbuffers-python easyconfig)
@boegel boegel enabled auto-merge February 13, 2021 14:18
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Feb 13, 2021

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
node3112.skitty.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/9f4215295c0491d0616940ce94c9e029 for a full test report.

Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@boegel boegel merged commit 454c4c4 into easybuilders:develop Feb 13, 2021
@Flamefire Flamefire deleted the 20210212124639_new_pr_Bazel372 branch February 13, 2021 23:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants