ensure localrc is created in the correct subdir for NVHPC v22.9+ #3240

jfgrimm · 2024-03-01T12:14:06Z

To fix issue reported in slack. Currently, compiling the following minimal example fails:

$ cat minimal.cpp
#include <ranges>

int main(){ return 0; }
$ nvc++ -std=c++20 minimal.cpp -o minimal
"minimal.cpp", line 1: catastrophic error: cannot open source file "ranges"
  #include <ranges>
                   ^

1 catastrophic error detected in the compilation of "minimal.cpp".
Compilation terminated.

Ss noticed by @branfosj:

During the install we use makelocalrc to generate a localrc file. This has a bunch of pointers to the GCC install.
In my working 22.3 install, there is one of these files. In Linux_x86_64/22.3/compilers/bin/localrc
In my broken 24.1 install there are two of them

Linux_x86_64/24.1/compilers/bin/localrc
Linux_x86_64/24.1/compilers/localrc

The second of these is the one generated by EB and is correct. The first one has a mix of OS GCC and EB GCC in it.

(created using eb --new-pr)

jfgrimm · 2024-03-01T13:04:08Z

Test report by @jfgrimm

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

SUCCESS NVHPC-22.7-CUDA-11.7.0.eb
SUCCESS NVHPC-22.9-CUDA-11.7.0.eb
SUCCESS NVHPC-22.11-CUDA-11.7.0.eb
SUCCESS NVHPC-23.1-CUDA-12.0.0.eb
SUCCESS NVHPC-23.7-CUDA-12.1.1.eb

Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
himem01.viking2.yor.alces.network - Linux Rocky Linux 8.8, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7643 48-Core Processor, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/jfgrimm/827262c27e9c29fd815b783377b97e48 for a full test report.

edit: I can confirm that all the above modules can now compile the example without issues

boegel · 2024-03-01T13:15:06Z

@jfgrimm Can we add that minimal test as a sanity check command in sanity_check_step, while we're at it?

jfgrimm · 2024-03-01T13:18:46Z

@boegel we could, but it will only show up when the system compiler is older than GCC 9, no?
Perhaps we should check there is only one locale, with sensible settings

boegel · 2024-03-01T13:20:40Z

@boegel we could, but it will only show up when the system compiler is older than GCC 9, no? Perhaps we should check there is only one locale, with sensible settings

That doesn't seem unlikely to me:

$ cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 8.8 (Ootpa)
$ which gcc
/usr/bin/gcc
$ gcc -V
...
gcc version 8.5.0 20210514 (Red Hat 8.5.0-18) (GCC)

It's just good to catch this type of problem early on via a lightweight sanity check, we shouldn't declare success on the installation if it's picking up the wrong GCC...

jfgrimm · 2024-03-01T14:50:47Z

Test report by @jfgrimm

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

SUCCESS NVHPC-22.7-CUDA-11.7.0.eb
SUCCESS NVHPC-22.9-CUDA-11.7.0.eb
SUCCESS NVHPC-22.11-CUDA-11.7.0.eb
SUCCESS NVHPC-23.1-CUDA-12.0.0.eb
SUCCESS NVHPC-23.7-CUDA-12.1.1.eb

Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
himem01.viking2.yor.alces.network - Linux Rocky Linux 8.8, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7643 48-Core Processor, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/jfgrimm/6f845306a003de633715871e698f4d1d for a full test report.

jfgrimm · 2024-03-01T14:53:22Z

@boegel done

boegel · 2024-03-01T15:06:02Z

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
EB_ARGS="NVHPC-24.1-CUDA-12.3.0.eb --sanity-check-only"

branfosj · 2024-03-01T15:08:09Z

Test report by @branfosj

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

FAIL (build issue) NVHPC-20.11.eb (partial log available at https://gist.github.com/branfosj/5868a45caaf92a6951d28fd1e6b5911f)

Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0105u03b - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8360Y CPU @ 2.40GHz (icelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/8c593983c4914e341aed350fa254fe2a for a full test report.

boegelbot · 2024-03-01T15:10:05Z

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=3240 EB_ARGS="NVHPC-24.1-CUDA-12.3.0.eb --sanity-check-only" EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyblocks /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_3240 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

exit code: 0
output:

Submitted batch job 13006

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1973357008 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

boegelbot · 2024-03-01T15:10:24Z

Test report by @boegelbot

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

FAIL (build issue) NVHPC-24.1-CUDA-12.3.0.eb (partial log available at https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/59e8b133fc1ff4780cec22433cf5d047)

Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/10d893a3cd0d7cba3970bdd6636a367e for a full test report.

branfosj · 2024-03-01T15:11:05Z

My failure is with EB5

nvc++ is checked:

== 2024-03-01 15:08:04,681 run.py:379 INFO Shell command completed successfully (see output above): nvc++ -v

but then we unload the module

== 2024-03-01 15:08:05,097 run.py:379 INFO Shell command completed successfully (see output above): /usr/share/lmod/lmod/libexec/lmod python unload NVHPC/20.11

so nvc++ is no longer found

== 2024-03-01 15:08:05,102 run.py:578 INFO running cmd: nvc++ -std=c++20 minimal.cpp -o minimal 
== 2024-03-01 15:08:07,590 build_log.py:171 ERROR EasyBuild encountered an error (at easybuild/src/easybuild-framework/easybuild/base/exceptions.py:126 in __init__): cmd "nvc++ -std=c++20 minimal.cpp -o minimal" exited with exit code 127 and output:
/bin/bash: nvc++: command not found

boegel · 2024-03-01T15:15:03Z

@branfosj We should pass the nvc++ command via custom_commands, then that problem shouldn't occur.

I'll take a quick look at that...

jfgrimm · 2024-03-01T15:19:21Z

ah right
I assume I didn't see that because we rpath

…anity_check_step

easybuild/easyblocks/n/nvhpc.py

run minimal NVHPC compilation command via custom_commands passed to sanity_check_step

boegel · 2024-03-01T15:36:10Z

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3
EB_ARGS="NVHPC-24.1-CUDA-12.3.0.eb NVHPC-22.7-CUDA-11.7.0.eb"
EB_BRANCH=5.0.x

boegelbot · 2024-03-01T15:53:17Z

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ "5.0.x" != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH="5.0.x" ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/"5.0.x" source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=3240 EB_ARGS="NVHPC-24.1-CUDA-12.3.0.eb NVHPC-22.7-CUDA-11.7.0.eb" EB_REPO=easybuild-easyblocks EB_BRANCH="5.0.x" /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_3240 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

exit code: 0
output:

Submitted batch job 3706

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1973401312 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

easybuild/easyblocks/n/nvhpc.py

boegelbot · 2024-03-01T16:07:54Z

Test report by @boegelbot

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

FAIL (build issue) NVHPC-24.1-CUDA-12.3.0.eb (partial log available at https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/7b8a1e3b2501d22753d6eb12d0647cc2)
SUCCESS NVHPC-22.7-CUDA-11.7.0.eb

Build succeeded for 1 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.3, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/f75bf019c003d8b01bd9132dd5f65ce6 for a full test report.

jfgrimm · 2024-03-01T16:13:14Z

@boegel are we using an unsupported GCC/CUDA combination in NVHPC 24.1? I'm not sure there is a CUDA release that supports GCC 13.x yet...

edit: hmm, compiling the example with NVHPC 24.1 doesn't fail for me

boegel · 2024-03-02T12:34:45Z

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
EB_ARGS="NVIDIA-20.11.eb NVIDIA-20.7.eb NVIDIA-20.9.eb NVIDIA-21.11.eb NVIDIA-21.2.eb NVIDIA-21.3.eb NVIDIA-21.5.eb NVIDIA-21.9.eb NVIDIA-22.1-CUDA-11.4.1.eb NVIDIA-22.11-CUDA-11.7.0.eb NVIDIA-22.7-CUDA-11.7.0.eb NVIDIA-22.9-CUDA-11.7.0.eb NVIDIA-23.1-CUDA-12.0.0.eb NVIDIA-23.7-CUDA-12.1.1.eb NVIDIA-23.7-CUDA-12.2.0.eb NVIDIA-24.1-CUDA-12.3.0.eb"

boegel · 2024-03-02T12:35:42Z

@boegel are we using an unsupported GCC/CUDA combination in NVHPC 24.1? I'm not sure there is a CUDA release that supports GCC 13.x yet...

edit: hmm, compiling the example with NVHPC 24.1 doesn't fail for me

I suspect it may be a problem with RHEL 9.x more than with the GCC being used...

That issue shouldn't block this PR.

boegelbot · 2024-03-02T12:40:05Z

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=3240 EB_ARGS="NVIDIA-20.11.eb NVIDIA-20.7.eb NVIDIA-20.9.eb NVIDIA-21.11.eb NVIDIA-21.2.eb NVIDIA-21.3.eb NVIDIA-21.5.eb NVIDIA-21.9.eb NVIDIA-22.1-CUDA-11.4.1.eb NVIDIA-22.11-CUDA-11.7.0.eb NVIDIA-22.7-CUDA-11.7.0.eb NVIDIA-22.9-CUDA-11.7.0.eb NVIDIA-23.1-CUDA-12.0.0.eb NVIDIA-23.7-CUDA-12.1.1.eb NVIDIA-23.7-CUDA-12.2.0.eb NVIDIA-24.1-CUDA-12.3.0.eb" EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyblocks /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_3240 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

exit code: 0
output:

Submitted batch job 13014

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1974785517 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

SebastianAchilles · 2024-03-06T21:44:47Z

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
EB_ARGS="NVHPC-20.11.eb NVHPC-20.7.eb NVHPC-20.9.eb NVHPC-21.11.eb NVHPC-21.2.eb NVHPC-21.3.eb NVHPC-21.5.eb NVHPC-21.9.eb NVHPC-22.11-CUDA-11.7.0.eb NVHPC-22.7-CUDA-11.7.0.eb NVHPC-22.9-CUDA-11.7.0.eb NVHPC-23.1-CUDA-12.0.0.eb NVHPC-23.7-CUDA-12.1.1.eb NVHPC-23.7-CUDA-12.2.0.eb NVHPC-24.1-CUDA-12.3.0.eb"

boegelbot · 2024-03-06T21:50:05Z

@SebastianAchilles: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=3240 EB_ARGS="NVHPC-20.11.eb NVHPC-20.7.eb NVHPC-20.9.eb NVHPC-21.11.eb NVHPC-21.2.eb NVHPC-21.3.eb NVHPC-21.5.eb NVHPC-21.9.eb NVHPC-22.11-CUDA-11.7.0.eb NVHPC-22.7-CUDA-11.7.0.eb NVHPC-22.9-CUDA-11.7.0.eb NVHPC-23.1-CUDA-12.0.0.eb NVHPC-23.7-CUDA-12.1.1.eb NVHPC-23.7-CUDA-12.2.0.eb NVHPC-24.1-CUDA-12.3.0.eb" EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyblocks /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_3240 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

exit code: 0
output:

Submitted batch job 13041

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1981851883 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

boegelbot · 2024-03-06T23:29:46Z

Test report by @boegelbot

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

FAIL (build issue) NVHPC-20.11.eb (partial log available at https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/76eae8de6b717514de6c4d71a80f109a)
FAIL (build issue) NVHPC-20.7.eb (partial log available at https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/7038fefadea5c8c7fcabde71e7499bc9)
FAIL (build issue) NVHPC-20.9.eb (partial log available at https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/9ad9b259e042a8e10fd61d38c888b42b)
SUCCESS NVHPC-21.11.eb
SUCCESS NVHPC-21.2.eb
SUCCESS NVHPC-21.3.eb
SUCCESS NVHPC-21.5.eb
SUCCESS NVHPC-21.9.eb
SUCCESS NVHPC-22.11-CUDA-11.7.0.eb
SUCCESS NVHPC-22.7-CUDA-11.7.0.eb
SUCCESS NVHPC-22.9-CUDA-11.7.0.eb
SUCCESS NVHPC-23.1-CUDA-12.0.0.eb
SUCCESS NVHPC-23.7-CUDA-12.1.1.eb
SUCCESS NVHPC-23.7-CUDA-12.2.0.eb
SUCCESS NVHPC-24.1-CUDA-12.3.0.eb

Build succeeded for 12 out of 15 (15 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/aec80a45ae80021a23c15749020b2b21 for a full test report.

easybuild/easyblocks/n/nvhpc.py

Co-authored-by: Mikael Öhman <micketeer@gmail.com>

Micket

lgtm

Micket · 2024-04-02T16:01:22Z

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
EB_ARGS="NVHPC-20.11.eb NVHPC-20.7.eb NVHPC-20.9.eb"

boegelbot · 2024-04-02T16:10:06Z

@Micket: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=3240 EB_ARGS="NVHPC-20.11.eb NVHPC-20.7.eb NVHPC-20.9.eb" EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyblocks /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_3240 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

exit code: 0
output:

Submitted batch job 13246

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2032452776 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

Micket · 2024-04-02T16:14:58Z

Test report by @Micket

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

SUCCESS NVHPC-23.1-CUDA-12.0.0.eb
SUCCESS NVHPC-23.7-CUDA-12.1.1.eb

Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
vera-icelake-build - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Silver 4316 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/Micket/a8a31954082d2d1af62948515649954e for a full test report.

boegelbot · 2024-04-02T16:23:47Z

Test report by @boegelbot

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

SUCCESS NVHPC-20.11.eb
SUCCESS NVHPC-20.7.eb
SUCCESS NVHPC-20.9.eb

Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/7b477991b0fe982422a304a60f26a9f6 for a full test report.

Micket · 2024-04-02T16:26:41Z

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3
EB_ARGS="NVHPC-22.11-CUDA-11.7.0.eb NVHPC-22.7-CUDA-11.7.0.eb NVHPC-22.9-CUDA-11.7.0.eb NVHPC-23.1-CUDA-12.0.0.eb NVHPC-23.7-CUDA-12.1.1.eb NVHPC-23.7-CUDA-12.2.0.eb NVHPC-24.1-CUDA-12.3.0.eb"

boegelbot · 2024-04-02T16:33:08Z

@Micket: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=3240 EB_ARGS="NVHPC-22.11-CUDA-11.7.0.eb NVHPC-22.7-CUDA-11.7.0.eb NVHPC-22.9-CUDA-11.7.0.eb NVHPC-23.1-CUDA-12.0.0.eb NVHPC-23.7-CUDA-12.1.1.eb NVHPC-23.7-CUDA-12.2.0.eb NVHPC-24.1-CUDA-12.3.0.eb" EB_REPO=easybuild-easyblocks EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_3240 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

exit code: 0
output:

Submitted batch job 3911

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2032514951 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

boegelbot · 2024-04-02T17:38:26Z

Test report by @boegelbot

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

SUCCESS NVHPC-22.11-CUDA-11.7.0.eb
SUCCESS NVHPC-22.7-CUDA-11.7.0.eb
SUCCESS NVHPC-22.9-CUDA-11.7.0.eb
SUCCESS NVHPC-23.1-CUDA-12.0.0.eb
SUCCESS NVHPC-23.7-CUDA-12.1.1.eb
FAIL (build issue) NVHPC-24.1-CUDA-12.3.0.eb (partial log available at https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/42c6f7236775f1503832805e6885a53b)
SUCCESS CUDA-12.2.0.eb
SUCCESS NVHPC-23.7-CUDA-12.2.0.eb

Build succeeded for 7 out of 8 (7 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.3, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/9b64f2055cd19da230b993d78994cd65 for a full test report.

boegel

lgtm

Micket · 2024-04-02T20:15:02Z

Not sure what to make of the NVHPC-24.1-CUDA-12.3.0.eb failure on jsc-zen3.

boegel · 2024-04-02T21:33:20Z

Test report by @boegel

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

SUCCESS NVHPC-21.2.eb
SUCCESS NVHPC-22.9-CUDA-11.7.0.eb
SUCCESS NVHPC-24.1-CUDA-12.3.0.eb

Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
node3125.skitty.os - Linux RHEL 8.8, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegel/d4e98801b9360d640406797adac316c1 for a full test report.

boegel · 2024-04-03T06:56:37Z

Not sure what to make of the NVHPC-24.1-CUDA-12.3.0.eb failure on jsc-zen3.

@Micket That's most likely due to GCC 13.2 and CUDA 12.3.0 not being compatible, see also #20158, so that shouldn't block this PR.

ensure local.rc is created in the correct subdir for NVHPC v22.9+

7e30e28

jfgrimm added the bug fix label Mar 1, 2024

jfgrimm added this to the 4.x milestone Mar 1, 2024

jfgrimm changed the title ~~ensure local.rc is created in the correct subdir for NVHPC v22.9+~~ ensure localrc is created in the correct subdir for NVHPC v22.9+ Mar 1, 2024

boegel modified the milestones: 4.x, release after 4.9.0 Mar 1, 2024

compile minimal example in sanity check

1f3c98b

run minimal NVHPC compilation command via custom_commands passed to s…

dbc1c84

…anity_check_step

boegel mentioned this pull request Mar 1, 2024

run minimal NVHPC compilation command via custom_commands passed to sanity_check_step jfgrimm/easybuild-easyblocks#3

Merged

boegel requested changes Mar 1, 2024

View reviewed changes

easybuild/easyblocks/n/nvhpc.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

Merge pull request #3 from boegel/20240301121404_new_pr_nvhpc

a6b882b

run minimal NVHPC compilation command via custom_commands passed to sanity_check_step

boegel previously approved these changes Mar 1, 2024

View reviewed changes

jfgrimm dismissed boegel’s stale review via a6b882b March 1, 2024 15:38

jfgrimm commented Mar 1, 2024

View reviewed changes

easybuild/easyblocks/n/nvhpc.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

remove unused import

cba7365

jfgrimm mentioned this pull request Mar 1, 2024

{compiler}[system/system] NVHPC v24.1 w/ CUDA 12.3.0 easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs#19786

Merged

Micket requested changes Apr 2, 2024

View reviewed changes

easybuild/easyblocks/n/nvhpc.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

exclude c++ std test for old versions

a51d78b

Co-authored-by: Mikael Öhman <micketeer@gmail.com>

Micket approved these changes Apr 2, 2024

View reviewed changes

boegel approved these changes Apr 2, 2024

View reviewed changes

boegel merged commit b9d09f7 into easybuilders:develop Apr 3, 2024
47 checks passed

ensure localrc is created in the correct subdir for NVHPC v22.9+ #3240

ensure localrc is created in the correct subdir for NVHPC v22.9+ #3240

Conversation

jfgrimm commented Mar 1, 2024 • edited Loading

jfgrimm commented Mar 1, 2024 • edited Loading

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

boegel commented Mar 1, 2024

jfgrimm commented Mar 1, 2024

boegel commented Mar 1, 2024

jfgrimm commented Mar 1, 2024

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

jfgrimm commented Mar 1, 2024

boegel commented Mar 1, 2024

branfosj commented Mar 1, 2024

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

boegelbot commented Mar 1, 2024

boegelbot commented Mar 1, 2024

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

branfosj commented Mar 1, 2024

boegel commented Mar 1, 2024

jfgrimm commented Mar 1, 2024

boegel commented Mar 1, 2024 • edited Loading

boegelbot commented Mar 1, 2024

boegelbot commented Mar 1, 2024

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

jfgrimm commented Mar 1, 2024 • edited Loading

boegel commented Mar 2, 2024

boegel commented Mar 2, 2024

boegelbot commented Mar 2, 2024

SebastianAchilles commented Mar 6, 2024

boegelbot commented Mar 6, 2024

boegelbot commented Mar 6, 2024

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

Micket left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Micket commented Apr 2, 2024

boegelbot commented Apr 2, 2024

Micket commented Apr 2, 2024

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

boegelbot commented Apr 2, 2024

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

Micket commented Apr 2, 2024

boegelbot commented Apr 2, 2024

boegelbot commented Apr 2, 2024

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Micket commented Apr 2, 2024

boegel commented Apr 2, 2024

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

boegel commented Apr 3, 2024

jfgrimm commented Mar 1, 2024 •

edited

Loading

jfgrimm commented Mar 1, 2024 •

edited

Loading

boegel commented Mar 1, 2024 •

edited

Loading

jfgrimm commented Mar 1, 2024 •

edited

Loading