-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature 234 rrfs linetypes #248
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… and updates to the constants.py in METdbLoad
…t_ascii module
… for METreformat to use
…feature_234_RRFS_linetypes
…feature_234_RRFS_linetypes
…feature_234_RRFS_linetypes
changing name to reflect what this is testing, in light of more line type support (from point stat, grid stat, and ensemble stat tools).
upate pip to 23.3 to address vulnerability
name of test updated to reflect name change
…ter/METdataio into feature_234_RRFS_linetypes
… within the process_pct to support input that contains other linetypes.
…matching with line types in the constants.py file in METdbLoad
…name to .data for METplotpy compatibility
…feature_234_RRFS_linetypes
…ter/METdataio into feature_234_RRFS_linetypes
Fixed some minor formatting
hankenstein2
approved these changes
Dec 11, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great! I made a very small formatting fix in one of the rst files
This was
linked to
issues
Feb 7, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull Request Testing
Describe testing already performed for these changes:
successfully ran pytest tests in METdataio/METreformat/test
manually generated reformatted RHIST, PCT , ECNT data, VCNT, MCTS, and VL1L2 line type data
- ran successive times to ensure proper behavior for issue Bugfix remove existing output and update documentation reflecting change #232 (remove existing output if it already exists and write to new file)
- using data from
- METdataio/METreformat/test/data/rhis_phist_relp_orank and RHIST.yaml in METdataio/METreformat/test
- METdataio/METreformat/test/data/ensemble_stat, grid_stat, point_stat and CNT.yaml, CTC.yaml, CTS.yaml, FHO.yaml, MCTS.yaml, VCNT.yaml, SL1L2.yaml, VL1L2.yaml to reflect refactored behavior of write_stat_ascii.py
Recommend testing for the reviewer(s) to perform, including the location of input datasets, and any additional instructions:
PCT and ECNT line types
METdataio/METreformat/test/data/rhist_phist_relp_orank for RHIST line type
Generating reformatted data:
Run the following command from the command line:
For Engineer (Hank)
For Scientist (Vanderlei)
Do these changes include sufficient documentation updates, ensuring that no errors or warnings exist in the build of the documentation? [Yes ]
Do these changes include sufficient testing updates? [Yes]
Will this PR result in changes to the test suite? [ No]
If yes, describe the new output and/or changes to the existing output:
Please complete this pull request review by [Earliest convenience].
Pull Request Checklist
See the METplus Workflow for details.
Select: Reviewer(s)
Select: Organization level software support Project or Repository level development cycle Project
Select: Milestone as the version that will include these changes