-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 506
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Device support request] innr SP220 smart plug #2678
Comments
Manufacturer specific cluster FC82
Caught 2 further manufacturer specific attributes in the standard clusters |
So indeed Zigbee 3.0 as expected and no Simple Metering nor Electrical Measurement as expected/feared. What's the Image Type (in the OTAU panel)? The 0xFC82 cluster is new. Do the values change, as load increases? I do have an unused innr bridge lying around, if you want to sniff how it interacts with the SP 220. However, last time I checked, it was really unsophisticated. The device should already be exposed by the REST API plugin (as not-so-smart plug). Only thing to check is the whitelisting in BTW how do you do to send the Discover Attributes? deconz-cli-plugin? What's the byte code? |
The SP 220 does Indeed not support Simple Metering nor Electrical
Measurement as confirmed by INNR itself!
So no need to snif because it only does on/off
Op za 11 apr. 2020 om 22:09 schreef Erik Baauw <notifications@github.com>
… So indeed Zigbee 3.0 as expected and no *Simple Metering* nor *Electrical
Measurement* as expected/feared. What's the *Image Type* (in the OTAU
panel)? The 0xFC82 cluster is new. Do the values change, as load increases?
I do have an unused innr bridge lying around, if you want to sniff how it
interacts with the SP 220. However, last time I checked, it was really
unsophisticated.
The device should already be exposed by the REST API plugin (as
not-so-smart plug). Only thing to check is the whitelisting in
bindings.cpp for the attribute reporting. Best change modelId.startsWith(QLatin1String("SP
120")) to modelId.startsWith(QLatin1String("SP ")) (only in that file).
BTW how do you do to send the *Discover Attributes*? deconz-cli-plugin?
What's the byte code?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2678 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABNGEKEVPPDC4BGDDEQPLDLRMDE7TANCNFSM4MGDT2NA>
.
|
Image type is 0x0310
No, none of the values changes a bloody bit, even after 1h of my Sonos plaing stuff. Looks pretty useless.
Indeed. Pretty handy, at least for mains powered devices.
|
Holy crap, while documenting the GUI's keyboard shortcuts, I discovered that you can also send this request from the GUI. Select a cluster, select the node, press |
Gee, where did you get that from, trying? |
While editing the "deCONZ for Dummies" Wiki, I was double-checking the keys with the sniffer running. I did try all digit keys, but not all the letters, there could be another hidden gem (I was hoping for a Read Attributes of the Basic cluster). |
Nice one. |
No measurements is a "downgrade" from SP120, because I bought the SP120 for that ;-) So I can skip the SP220 completely. |
I mentioned that to INNR also. But the main customers use the HUE bridge for example and then there is no measurement available even with the SP120. Therefore they did not implement it in the SP220 and thereby reduced the costs for the new plug.
… On 21 Apr 2020, at 09:35, Alexander ***@***.***> wrote:
No measurements is a "downgrade" from SP120, because I bought the SP120 for that ;-) So I can skip the SP220 completely.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2678 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABNGEKFZWOS2OBGXTY5UCQLRNVEEPANCNFSM4MGDT2NA>.
|
I understand the business logic behind it, but they just lost me as a customer for plugs ;-) |
And again, did mention that to them. 1 of the + of the SP120 and reason some people use that plug.
Would have been a nice upgrade because of ZigBee 3.0 and attribute reporting…...
… On 21 Apr 2020, at 09:43, Alexander ***@***.***> wrote:
I understand the business logic behind it, but they just lost me as a customer for plugs ;-)
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2678 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABNGEKFXBQN4HTS2LHFG2XLRNVFAVANCNFSM4MGDT2NA>.
|
Indeed. From my perspective, power measurement was more a unique selling proposition. Since it's not in anymore, I'm out. Really enjoyed the SP 120. The SP 220 are more expensive btw ;) |
It seems this issue is resolved or otherwise inactive. If it is not, please re-open! |
Unfortunately I can't pair with my Conbee I stick plugged in... Any suggestions? My SP 120 could be connected without any problems... thanks in advance! |
Anyone, is the Sp220 accessable in the Phoscon app, and if so how should I do this? |
Same question here.. |
Basic cluster
Level Control
Power
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: