-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 203
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve prefetch performance further #633
Conversation
@jiangliu , a new test job has been submitted. Please wait in patience. The test job url: https://tone.openanolis.cn/ws/nrh4nnio/test_result/17074 |
@jiangliu , The CI test is completed, please check result:
Congratulations, your test job passed! |
Split blob prefetch request into small chunks for v6 images. There's no range based prefetch for v5 now, so disable it. Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <gerry@linux.alibaba.com>
When prefetch file list and prefetch_all are both enabled, the whole data may get prefetched twice. Though the second prefetch won't actually download data from remote, it's still waste. Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <gerry@linux.alibaba.com>
Improve the io request merging algorithm to hunt for more chances to reduce IO requests. Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <gerry@linux.alibaba.com>
@jiangliu , the code has been updated, so a new test job has been submitted. Please wait in patience. The test job url: https://tone.openanolis.cn/ws/nrh4nnio/test_result/17209 |
@jiangliu , The CI test is completed, please check result:
Congratulations, your test job passed! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Improve prefetch performance further, now v5 image performs as better as 1.1.2.