Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Organize fields on non-grouped blocks #12

Open
kisonay opened this issue Jul 23, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Organize fields on non-grouped blocks #12

kisonay opened this issue Jul 23, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
Feature Request New feature or request

Comments

@kisonay
Copy link

kisonay commented Jul 23, 2018

Possible enhancement. I have a matrix field that is rather small (3 blocks) and would like to use Spoon to organize the fields on each block.

I can't organize the fields unless the blocks are grouped together, which seems a little odd with 1 block in each group.

It would be nice to allow field organization for non-grouped blocks.

@joshangell joshangell added the Feature Request New feature or request label Jul 24, 2018
@joshangell joshangell self-assigned this Jul 24, 2018
@joshangell
Copy link
Contributor

I agree, its an unfortunate side effect of the field layouts depending on the block type groupings in the database.

@joshangell joshangell changed the title [Enhancement] Organize fields on on-groups blocks [Enhancement] Organize fields on non-groups blocks Aug 15, 2018
@joshangell joshangell changed the title [Enhancement] Organize fields on non-groups blocks [Enhancement] Organize fields on non-grouped blocks Aug 15, 2018
@joshangell joshangell changed the title [Enhancement] Organize fields on non-grouped blocks Organize fields on non-grouped blocks Sep 13, 2018
@jsunsawyer
Copy link

Yep. This was confusing as I thought I was missing an option. Installed Spoon simply for this feature.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature Request New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants