Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implemented "Go to Implementation" and "Peek Implementation" #1222

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 11, 2017

Conversation

ivanz
Copy link
Contributor

@ivanz ivanz commented Feb 11, 2017

Closes #37

Copy link
Member

@DustinCampbell DustinCampbell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome! Just some cosmetic tweaks for the changelog.

CHANGELOG.md Outdated
@@ -1,6 +1,13 @@
## 1.8.0 _(Not Yet Released)_

### Code Actions
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Four hashes please

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, I wouldn't put this under "Code Actions". Those are for code fixes and refactorings that appear in the light bulb menu. I'd actually give this it's own subheading: "Go to Implementation".

CHANGELOG.md Outdated
## 1.7.0 (February 8, 2017)

#### Syntax Hightlighting
### Syntax Hightlighting
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please don't change this

export default class CSharpImplementationProvider extends AbstractSupport implements ImplementationProvider {
constructor(server) {
super(server);
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this strictly needed if you're just calling super?

CHANGELOG.md Outdated

### Code Actions

* Support for "Go to Implementation" and "Peek Implementation". ([#37](https://github.com/OmniSharp/omnisharp-vscode/issues/37)) _(Contributed by [@ivanz](https://github.com/ivanz))_
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

autobiographical. 😄

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

😅

@DustinCampbell
Copy link
Member

Fantastic @ivanz! :smile;

I'll be back in a couple of hours. If you want to make those small changes to the changelog I requested, I'll merge when I'm back.

@ivanz ivanz force-pushed the goto-implementation branch from 21bd908 to ac3dbdf Compare February 11, 2017 15:18
@ivanz
Copy link
Contributor Author

ivanz commented Feb 11, 2017

Updated :)

@DustinCampbell
Copy link
Member

Thanks again @ivanz. You rock!

@DustinCampbell DustinCampbell merged commit cb1b063 into dotnet:master Feb 11, 2017
@jchannon
Copy link
Contributor

Awesome stuff!? Is there a CI build to try this out?

@DustinCampbell
Copy link
Member

No, we don't push CI builds. I'll need to create a beta release, which I was going to take a look at shortly. I need to get an omnisharp-roslyn build first to ensure that other recently-fixed issues are included in the first 1.8 beta build.

@jchannon
Copy link
Contributor

Cool. No worries

@ivanz ivanz deleted the goto-implementation branch February 13, 2017 17:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants