-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 677
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implemented "Go to Implementation" and "Peek Implementation" #1222
Conversation
5b152a5
to
21bd908
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome! Just some cosmetic tweaks for the changelog.
CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
@@ -1,6 +1,13 @@ | |||
## 1.8.0 _(Not Yet Released)_ | |||
|
|||
### Code Actions |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Four hashes please
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also, I wouldn't put this under "Code Actions". Those are for code fixes and refactorings that appear in the light bulb menu. I'd actually give this it's own subheading: "Go to Implementation".
CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
## 1.7.0 (February 8, 2017) | ||
|
||
#### Syntax Hightlighting | ||
### Syntax Hightlighting |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please don't change this
export default class CSharpImplementationProvider extends AbstractSupport implements ImplementationProvider { | ||
constructor(server) { | ||
super(server); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this strictly needed if you're just calling super?
CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
|
||
### Code Actions | ||
|
||
* Support for "Go to Implementation" and "Peek Implementation". ([#37](https://github.com/OmniSharp/omnisharp-vscode/issues/37)) _(Contributed by [@ivanz](https://github.com/ivanz))_ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
autobiographical. 😄
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
😅
Fantastic @ivanz! :smile; I'll be back in a couple of hours. If you want to make those small changes to the changelog I requested, I'll merge when I'm back. |
21bd908
to
ac3dbdf
Compare
Updated :) |
Thanks again @ivanz. You rock! |
Awesome stuff!? Is there a CI build to try this out? |
No, we don't push CI builds. I'll need to create a beta release, which I was going to take a look at shortly. I need to get an omnisharp-roslyn build first to ensure that other recently-fixed issues are included in the first 1.8 beta build. |
Cool. No worries |
Closes #37