Add Forced Low Memory Mode feature #11355
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| using System.Collections.Generic; | ||
| using System.Threading.Tasks; | ||
|
|
||
| namespace Roslyn.VisualStudio.DiagnosticsWindow.OptionsPages |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just FYI, I'm not sure how widely consumed this project is, or whether anybody ever installs it. I was considering deleting it...but this is a fine use. You might have a (small) uphill battle to get people to install it again.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it comes along with install dogfood.
|
👍 |
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| class MemoryHogger |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue #11354
This adds an option that lets Roslyn developers put their VS process into a low memory mode. This will simulate a VS install with more constrained address space.
@MattGertz @jasonmalinowski @jared @Pilchie please review