Language Feature Status Document #10233
Conversation
|
CC @dotnet/roslyn-compiler |
| # FAQ | ||
|
|
||
| - **Is target version a guarantee?**: No. It's explicitly not a guarantee. This is just the plan of record to the best of our knowledge at this time. | ||
| - **Where are these State values defined?**: Take a look at the [Developing a Language Feature](docs/contributing/Developing a Language Feature.md) document. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This relative link is bad. Drop the initial docs/.
|
@dotnet/ldm FYI, Jared is proposing to publish this list as the language feature set for C# 7. |
| | Out var | none | Feature Specification | [alekseyts](https://github.com/alekseyts) | | ||
| | With Exprs | none | Feature Specification | [gafter](https://github.com/gafter) | | ||
|
|
||
| ## C# 7.0 and VB 15 + 1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm pretty sure you don't mean to say that non-null ref types are planned for C# 7. Does the and operator in the section header have higher precedence than the +?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The language is Jared. The operator precedence level is defined as Jared. 😄
|
Please hold off on publishing this until we can reconcile it with the LDM, which we should aim to do on Wednesday of next week. |
|
Don't see the need to wait here. This the active work the compiler team is tracking, not what LDM is designing. |
A summary of our language work for the upcoming compilers.