This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 23, 2023. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Japan is going to introduce the new era next year 2019, this new era will be added to the Japanese calendar. This new era would affect anyone converting, formatting or parsing dates using the Japanese calendar.
Users who formatted future dates before introducing the new era and then try to parse these dates after introducing the new era will fail and get parsing exception. The reason is the year number will not be valid in the old era anymore because the new era set a year limit to the old era.
Here is an example:
Format a date like "平成 32年2月1日" which saying year 32 in the era "平成". after we introduce the new era, the old era "平成" will be limited up to and including year 31 so year 32 is exceeding the era end.
The fix is to allow the parser succeeds with such dates and have a config switch which can be used to for anyone want the old behavior.