Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 20, 2023. It is now read-only.

Merge rel/1.0.0-preview4 back into rel/1.0.0 #4974

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Dec 9, 2016

Conversation

livarcocc
Copy link

@piotrpMSFT @krwq @jgoshi

livarcocc and others added 19 commits December 5, 2016 14:40
Add more xlf files for new strings
Updating the preview4 channel to rel-1.0.0-preview4
…ackages so that test packages can reference exact packages. We need that because of NuGet/Home#4063. Without it, pack creates the nuspec with a version like 1.0.0-version-, instead of 1.0.0-version-<version_used_in_build>, which leads to problems when restoring the tool. Like, it ends up restoring to the closest version of the package (oldest), instead of the latest.
…ackages

Adding a SdkNugetVersion property when invoking dotnet pack on test packages
…te_p4

use Sdk attribute in F# templates too (branch preview4)
* Update WebSDK version

* Update web template to get rid of globs

aspnet/Templates#735
* Adding MigrateWebSdkRule to the DefaultMigrationRuleSet and adding a E2E test to cover it.

* Do not migrate compile and EmbeddedResources for web application, because those are included in the Web Sdk already.

* Addressing code review comments
* rel/1.0.0-preview4:
  Adding MigrateWebSdkRule to the DefaultMigrationRuleSet (dotnet#4963)
  MSBuild to 15.1.458 (dotnet#4950)
  Update web template for Web SDK 154 (dotnet#4948)
  Adding a SdkNugetVersion property when invoking dotnet pack on test packages so that test packages can reference exact packages. We need that because of NuGet/Home#4063. Without it, pack creates the nuspec with a version like 1.0.0-version-, instead of 1.0.0-version-<version_used_in_build>, which leads to problems when restoring the tool. Like, it ends up restoring to the closest version of the package (oldest), instead of the latest.
  remove unused directories from bundled sdks
  fix mstest package version, aligned to c#
  align f# web template
  align f# xunit template
  align f# mstest template
  align f# lib template
  align f# console proj
  bundle fsharp sdk, only Sdk directory is required
  Add more xlf files for new strings
  Updating the preview4 channel to rel-1.0.0-preview4
@livarcocc
Copy link
Author

@dotnet-bot Test CentOS7.1 x64 Debug Build
@dotnet-bot Test OpenSUSE13.2 x64 Debug Build
@dotnet-bot Test Windows_NT x64 Release Build

@livarcocc
Copy link
Author

@dotnet-bot Test Windows_NT x64 Release Build

@TheRealPiotrP
Copy link

@MattGertz

@TheRealPiotrP TheRealPiotrP merged commit 1fd99f1 into dotnet:rel/1.0.0 Dec 9, 2016
@TheRealPiotrP TheRealPiotrP deleted the merge_preview4 branch December 9, 2016 08:30
mlorbetske pushed a commit to mlorbetske/cli that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2016
* Updating the preview4 channel to rel-1.0.0-preview4

* Add more xlf files for new strings

* bundle fsharp sdk, only Sdk directory is required

* align f# console proj

* align f# lib template

* align f# mstest template

* align f# xunit template

* align f# web template

* fix mstest package version, aligned to c#

* remove unused directories from bundled sdks

* Adding a SdkNugetVersion property when invoking dotnet pack on test packages so that test packages can reference exact packages. We need that because of NuGet/Home#4063. Without it, pack creates the nuspec with a version like 1.0.0-version-, instead of 1.0.0-version-<version_used_in_build>, which leads to problems when restoring the tool. Like, it ends up restoring to the closest version of the package (oldest), instead of the latest.

* Update web template for Web SDK 154 (dotnet#4948)

* Update WebSDK version

* Update web template to get rid of globs

aspnet/Templates#735

* MSBuild to 15.1.458 (dotnet#4950)

* Adding MigrateWebSdkRule to the DefaultMigrationRuleSet (dotnet#4963)

* Adding MigrateWebSdkRule to the DefaultMigrationRuleSet and adding a E2E test to cover it.

* Do not migrate compile and EmbeddedResources for web application, because those are included in the Web Sdk already.

* Addressing code review comments
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants