Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove DCP and Dashboard from the .NET Aspire SDK Workload #4708
Remove DCP and Dashboard from the .NET Aspire SDK Workload #4708
Changes from 12 commits
e73ec3d
ed4ec96
8667f40
743ba94
8c3a92b
c040418
6c84434
4b604ab
fd82056
aa5ae81
015bd6b
1a0b6a9
ccf0468
d5036f4
3ec11e5
bbfe505
f52a55a
928ede4
c3cdb9b
bd4ea6f
207d4a9
7c48160
a5479c9
54340cf
063472a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This bit makes it sound like the source generation comes from this SDK, but it doesn't. I would just drop it to avoid confusion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This isn't a self-contained app.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
Aspire.Hosting.AppHost
is the nuget package that is referenced by all AppHost projects. It has a dependency onAspire.Hosting
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did actually mean Aspire.Hosting as that is the one that we had in the workload, but the wording is wrong here I agree, so I'll fix that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are we creating all these RID specific packages for the Dashboard just so we can get RID specific app hosts? 99% of the nuget package is identical. The only difference is the executable that launches the app?
Could we make it more like a .NET global tool and only have to ship 1 nuget package?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could, I believe. We actually no longer need to have all of these separate projects anymore, so in a follow up PR I am going to explore how to reduce and simplify this.
This file was deleted.
This file was deleted.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we replace these, and the Dashboard Sdk's arch specific projects with one project, and pass in the properties of
DcpRuntime
, andDcpPlatformType
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, we probably can now. We originally needed the individual projects because we were having P2P references from the AppHost package, beacause we needed to have a package reference. Now that those are being dynamically added by the SDK, we no longer need this. I'll try to get this done in the next day but if I can get to it I may have to punt this to a follow up PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Follow up PR sounds perfectly reasonable for this.