-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update 🥒 tests to use dockerfile_inline
#10508
Conversation
Codecov ReportPatch coverage has no change and project coverage change:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## v2 #10508 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 19.35% 19.37% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 104 104
Lines 9197 9197
==========================================
+ Hits 1780 1782 +2
+ Misses 7230 7228 -2
Partials 187 187 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
LGTM. Maybe we could have both ? |
Yup! I changed both since the previous usecase is already thoroughly covered in the other tests, but we can add another cucumber scenario to make sure both are covered here. I'll TAL at it later. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oops I take-backsies my approval, there's a typo in the YAML so the CI is failing
617ea30
to
514d154
Compare
514d154
to
2fb448b
Compare
Signed-off-by: Laura Brehm <laurabrehm@hey.com>
2fb448b
to
ee70085
Compare
What I did
Update Cucumber tests to use
dockerfile_inline
when appropriate, for clarity (and coverage).(not mandatory) A picture of a cute animal, if possible in relation to what you did