Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

877: Link checker #878

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Mar 28, 2023
Merged

877: Link checker #878

merged 16 commits into from
Mar 28, 2023

Conversation

f1sh1918
Copy link
Contributor

@f1sh1918 f1sh1918 commented Mar 20, 2023

Just added the link checker to reset password that checks if resetKey exists and the link is not expired.
Added for applicant and verification view an empty collection check

resolves #877

@f1sh1918 f1sh1918 changed the title 677: Link checker 877: Link checker Mar 21, 2023
@f1sh1918 f1sh1918 marked this pull request as ready for review March 21, 2023 09:56
@f1sh1918 f1sh1918 requested a review from michael-markl March 21, 2023 09:56
f1sh1918 and others added 5 commits March 27, 2023 11:56
Co-authored-by: Michael Markl <marklmichael98@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Markl <marklmichael98@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Markl <marklmichael98@gmail.com>
# Conflicts:
#	administration/src/application-verification/VerificationController.tsx
#	administration/src/components/applications/ApplicationApplicantController.tsx
Copy link
Member

@michael-markl michael-markl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

More and more, I have the feeling that using the graphql errors (and extending them to more endpoints) leads to unintuitive, intransparent code (especially in the error handling in the frontends, but also in the backend)...

We can merge this PR, but I feel like in #873 we should analyze whether proper return types might be a better fit for us.

@f1sh1918 f1sh1918 enabled auto-merge March 28, 2023 08:23
@f1sh1918 f1sh1918 merged commit 99fcd32 into main Mar 28, 2023
@f1sh1918 f1sh1918 deleted the 677-link-checker branch March 28, 2023 08:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add link checker for links send via mail
2 participants