Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: getByDocId can optionally throw #959

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

EvanHahn
Copy link
Contributor

This adds a new option to DataType.prototype.getByDocId(), mustBeFound. If set to false and the document doesn't exist, it will resolve with null instead of throwing.

If the option is missing or set to true, the current behavior is maintained (throwing if the document is missing).

I think this is a useful feature on its own but will also hopefully make at least one upcoming change a little easier.

@EvanHahn EvanHahn force-pushed the getByDocId-allow-missing branch from 376be17 to d260252 Compare November 12, 2024 22:06
@@ -186,7 +200,7 @@ export class DataType extends TypedEmitter {
}

/**
* @param {MapeoDoc} doc
* @param {any} doc
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change, and the one below, come from #951.

This adds a new option to `DataType.prototype.getByDocId()`,
`mustBeFound`. If set to `false` and the document doesn't exist, it will
resolve with `null` instead of throwing.

If the option is missing or set to `true`, the current behavior is
maintained (throwing if the document is missing).

I think this is a useful feature on its own but will also hopefully make
at least one [upcoming change][0] a little easier.

[0]: #188
@EvanHahn EvanHahn force-pushed the getByDocId-allow-missing branch from d260252 to 56f7e18 Compare November 12, 2024 23:14
@EvanHahn EvanHahn merged commit a8f9d1a into main Nov 18, 2024
9 checks passed
@EvanHahn EvanHahn deleted the getByDocId-allow-missing branch November 18, 2024 20:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant