chore: fix flaky "project leave" tests #553
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
These tests have been very flaky. After a few hours of investigation it seems that peers weren't synced before someone left the project, which caused `waitForSync` to hang indefinitely. We likely want our leave code to be more robust. In the short term, however, I think it's worth fixing these tests.
achou11
approved these changes
Apr 11, 2024
This was referenced Apr 11, 2024
This was referenced Jun 20, 2024
This was referenced Jul 25, 2024
This was referenced Aug 21, 2024
This was referenced Aug 29, 2024
This was referenced Sep 11, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
These tests have been very flaky. After a few hours of investigation it seems that peers weren't synced before someone left the project, which caused
waitForSyncto hang indefinitely.We likely want our leave code to be more robust. In the short term, however, I think it's worth fixing these tests. (See #469 (comment) for these "make it more robust" tasks.)
Closes #540.