Added code review article (#128)

* Added code review article

* Fixed summary and  changed image layout

* added image title

* remove image meta data

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Rebecca Sutton Koeser <rlskoeser@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Rebecca Sutton Koeser <rlskoeser@users.noreply.github.com>

content/blog/2024-10-31-code-review-paper.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+title: "Recently published: 'Code Review in Digital Humanities'"
+slug: 2024-paper-code-review
+date: 2024-10-31T09:00:15-04:00
+author: Julia Damerow, Rebecca Sutton Koeser, Malte Vogl 
+thumbnail: /images/posts/code-review-cat.png
+featureImage: /images/posts/code-review-cat.png
+featureImageAlt: A cat looking at code.
+featureImageCap: Cat "Tango" reviewing code and is not amused.
+summary: "Based on a poster at DH2022, Julia Damerow, Rebecca Sutton Koeser, Jeffrey C. Carver, and Malte Vogl have published a paper in *Digital Scholarship in the Humanities* describing the work of the Community Code Review Working Group of DHTech."
+tags:
+   - WhatsHappening
+---
+
+
+Expanding on a poster presented at DH2022, Julia Damerow, Rebecca Sutton Koeser, Jeffrey C. Carver, and Malte Vogl have published a paper in *Digital Scholarship in the Humanities* describing the importance of code review for humanities research software and the work of the DHTech [Community Code Review Working Group](https://dhcodereview.github.io/) to address that need. 
+
+
+
+<div style="clear: both"></div>
+
+### "Code Review in Digital Humanities" by Julia Damerow, Rebecca Sutton Koeser, Jeffrey C. Carver, and Malte Vogl 
+
+> Software and computational methods offer tremendous possibilities for digital humanities research, both accelerating existing work and opening up entirely new questions. However, software also has the potential to introduce new kinds of errors into the research workflow. How do we know that the software developed for a digital humanities project is error free and does what we think it does? Code review is a widespread technique to improve software quality and reduce the number of flaws, where a programmer other than the author reviews and comments on the source code. However, given that many digital humanities developers work in developer teams of one, code review is often not possible. In this article, we share progress and insights from an effort to establish a community code review process for digital humanities, and provide background to help understand the need and potential impacts of this work.
+
+Julia Damerow, Rebecca Sutton Koeser, Jeffrey C Carver, Malte Vogl, Code review in digital humanities, *Digital Scholarship in the Humanities*, 2024; fqae052, [https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqae052](https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqae052).