Field inputs for ways

[sethvincent]

Based on our current fields.json in the edit-ways branch, the unsupported fields right now are:

• access
• radio
• url
• networkCombo
• cycleway
• email
• tel
• identifier
• maxspeed
• onewayCheck
• restrictions
• wikidata
• structureRadio
• wikipedia

Not all of these are related to editing ways, and this PR will focus on those that are needed for ways.

included in this pull request

so far i've been working on:

• access
• radio
• cycleway
• maxspeed
• structureRadio
• networkCombo
• onewayCheck

should be saved for another pull request

• identifier
• wikidata
• wikipedia
• email
• tel
• url
• restrictions (turn restrictions, added to relations)

[sethvincent]

I added a commit that adds the onewayCheck field and that gives the access field some needed styles (it's really a field group), and also makes some revisions so that the access field works properly.

I realized that the restriction field/tag is something that is set on relations. I'm guessing that for now we're not working with relations in this editor.

[sethvincent]

Did some more testing with this today, fixed some bugs that came up when merging the edit-ways branch, and I think it's ready to review.

I believe I've tested all of these fields, though it's hard to say if I've tried every possible permutation of them.

To recap, this pull request includes changes for these fields:

• access
• radio
• cycleway
• maxspeed
• structureRadio
• networkCombo
• onewayCheck

These remaining unsupported fields should be addressed in a later pull request:

• identifier
• wikidata
• wikipedia
• email
• tel
• url
• restrictions (turn restrictions, added to relations)

[geohacker]

@sethvincent I'm noticing something weird with the fields now. I'm not entirely sure if this is introduced in this branch. For example:

• Select a primary highway
• Click edit attributes
• Click add field

Apart from that, this PR looks and works great for me! Thank you.

[sethvincent]

@geohacker thanks I'll look into that

[geohacker]

The inherited presets is a really good catch @sethvincent. This is looking really good to me.