ci: add CODEOWNERS file #1550
Merged
ci: add CODEOWNERS file #1550
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
|
lowlighter
commented
Nov 11, 2021
| @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ | |||
| # github folder and all project root files (readme, license, general config, etc.) | |||
| .github/ @bartlomieju @kt3k | |||
| /* @bartlomieju @kt3k | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This glob specifically matches all files located on project root (like deno.json, LICENSE, etc.)
kt3k
approved these changes
Nov 11, 2021
bartlomieju
approved these changes
Nov 11, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #1472
Originally posted by bartlomieju October 26, 2021
We should have a bot that automatically requests a review from one of maintainers for PRs.
In the beginning it could assign either me or kt3k
This uses GitHub's codeowners feature, which automatically request a review from maintainers depending on which files were edited. In addition, the UI will also display which reviewers will be mandated when browsing files directly on GitHub:
I'll leave bartlomieju and kt3k as suggested in initial issue