Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove GoPowerScale #10

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 7, 2023
Merged

Remove GoPowerScale #10

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 7, 2023

Conversation

doriac11
Copy link
Collaborator

@doriac11 doriac11 commented Aug 3, 2023

Description

  • Remove Go PowerScale and its fields since we are using OpenAPI.

ISSUE TYPE

  • Feature Pull Request
RESOURCE OR DATASOURCE NAME

NA

Checklist:

  • [.x] I have performed a self-review of my own code to ensure there are no formatting, vetting, linting, or security issues
  • I have verified that new and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have not allowed coverage numbers to degenerate
  • I have maintained at least 80% code coverage
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have maintained backward compatibility

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • Unit tests
  • Acceptance tests

@doriac11
Copy link
Collaborator Author

doriac11 commented Aug 3, 2023

run e2e test

@NavisJ
Copy link
Contributor

NavisJ commented Aug 7, 2023

The session-based auth is removed hence. Are we going to support that in OpenAPI ?

@forrestxia forrestxia merged commit e980cac into main Aug 7, 2023
6 checks passed
@forrestxia forrestxia deleted the remove-gopowerscale branch August 7, 2023 02:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants