Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(CI): remove CI env var to fix the CI #1704

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 7, 2025

Conversation

njzjz
Copy link
Member

@njzjz njzjz commented Jan 7, 2025

xref: materialsproject/pymatgen#4243 (comment)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated GitHub Actions workflow configuration with a minor environment variable adjustment to support testing processes.

xref: materialsproject/pymatgen#4243 (comment)

Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <jinzhe.zeng@rutgers.edu>
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 7, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow by replacing the command to run tests in the "Test" step with a multi-line script. This new script first unsets the CI environment variable before executing the coverage command, addressing a specific issue related to the pymatgen library. The overall structure and logic of the workflow remain intact, with the primary change being the addition of the unset CI command.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/test.yml Replaced the command to run tests with a multi-line script that unsets the CI environment variable before executing the coverage command.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f3f0129 and 1857b6f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: build (3.12)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/test.yml (1)

26-26: Fix the malformed issue link in the comment

The issue link contains an extra '1' at the end (4243#issuecomment-2573310051), which makes it invalid.

-        # https://github.com/materialsproject/pymatgen/issues/4243#issuecomment-2573310051
+        # https://github.com/materialsproject/pymatgen/issues/4243#issuecomment-257331005
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 255f268 and f3f0129.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/test.yml (1)

25-27: Verify the impact of unsetting the CI environment variable

While this change addresses the pymatgen issue, setting CI="" might affect other tools that rely on CI environment detection. Let's verify this is the recommended approach and document any potential side effects.

Consider adding a comment explaining:

  1. What specific issue this fixes in pymatgen
  2. Any known side effects on other tools
  3. Whether this is a temporary workaround or permanent solution
✅ Verification successful

The CI environment variable change appears safe to implement

The codebase analysis shows no usage of the CI environment variable in the repository or its configuration files. The change specifically addresses the pymatgen issue #4243 and shouldn't affect other tools.

Consider expanding the comment to:

env:
  # Workaround for pymatgen issue causing test failures in CI
  # See: https://github.com/materialsproject/pymatgen/issues/4243#issuecomment-2573310051
  CI: ""
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for CI environment variable usage in dependencies
rg -l "os\.environ\.get\(['\"]CI['\"]" || rg -l "os\.getenv\(['\"]CI['\"]"

# Check if any GitHub Actions specific code exists that might be affected
rg -l "GITHUB_ACTIONS.*CI"

Length of output: 112


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any CI environment variable references
rg -l "CI['\"]?\s*[:=]" 

# Search for CI environment checks in various forms
rg -l "process\.env\.CI|env\(['\"]*CI|CI\s*=|CI:|\"CI\":|'CI':"

# Check package.json files for CI-related configurations
fd package.json --exec cat {} \; | jq -r 'select(. | tostring | contains("CI"))'

# Look for GitHub Actions specific CI configurations
rg -l "env:.*CI|CI:.*\$\{\{|CI=.*\$\{\{"

Length of output: 226

@njzjz

This comment was marked as outdated.

@njzjz njzjz closed this Jan 7, 2025
Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <jinzhe.zeng@rutgers.edu>
@njzjz njzjz reopened this Jan 7, 2025
@njzjz njzjz requested a review from wanghan-iapcm January 7, 2025 08:44
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 49.51%. Comparing base (255f268) to head (1857b6f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on devel.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            devel    #1704   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   49.51%   49.51%           
=======================================
  Files          83       83           
  Lines       14863    14863           
=======================================
  Hits         7359     7359           
  Misses       7504     7504           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm merged commit 99b16e7 into deepmodeling:devel Jan 7, 2025
11 checks passed
njzjz added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2025
wanghan-iapcm pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2025
Reverts #1704

See
materialsproject/pymatgen#4243 (comment)

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Chores**
	- Updated GitHub Actions workflow configuration for testing.
	- Simplified test execution process in the CI pipeline.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants