fix(tests): fix skip_dp

[njzjz]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Updated the test skipping logic across multiple test files to reference the correct condition for skipping tests, enhancing the accuracy of test execution.
• Tests
  • Adjusted the skip_dp method in various test classes to improve the control flow and alignment with specific testing scenarios.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to the skip_dp method across multiple test files. The return statements in these methods have been modified to reference CommonTest.skip_dp instead of CommonTest.skip_pt. This change alters the logic determining whether specific tests should be skipped, affecting test execution based on the state of the new flag.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
source/tests/consistent/descriptor/test_dpa1.py,	Modified the skip_dp method to return CommonTest.skip_dp instead of CommonTest.skip_pt.
source/tests/consistent/descriptor/test_dpa2.py,	Modified the skip_dp method to return CommonTest.skip_dp instead of CommonTest.skip_pt.
source/tests/consistent/descriptor/test_se_atten_v2.py,	Modified the skip_dp method to return CommonTest.skip_dp instead of CommonTest.skip_pt.
source/tests/consistent/descriptor/test_se_t_tebd.py	Modified the skip_dp method to return CommonTest.skip_dp instead of CommonTest.skip_pt.

---

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c3ba728 and f07c5da.

Files selected for processing (4)

• source/tests/consistent/descriptor/test_dpa1.py (1 hunks)
• source/tests/consistent/descriptor/test_dpa2.py (1 hunks)
• source/tests/consistent/descriptor/test_se_atten_v2.py (1 hunks)
• source/tests/consistent/descriptor/test_se_t_tebd.py (1 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (4)

source/tests/consistent/descriptor/test_se_t_tebd.py (1)

119-119: Verify the updated skip logic in skip_dp.

The change from CommonTest.skip_pt to CommonTest.skip_dp alters the condition under which tests are skipped. Ensure that this change aligns with the intended testing strategy and that CommonTest.skip_dp is correctly implemented across the test suite.

Verification successful

---

Verified the updated skip logic in CommonTest.skip_dp.

The change from CommonTest.skip_pt to CommonTest.skip_dp aligns with the intended testing strategy. The CommonTest.skip_dp is defined as a class variable with the value False, indicating that tests are not skipped by default for the DP model. The usage across the test suite is consistent with this definition.

• CommonTest.skip_dp is defined in source/tests/consistent/common.py.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of `CommonTest.skip_dp` across the test suite.

# Test: Search for the usage of `CommonTest.skip_dp`. Expect: Consistent usage across all test files.
rg --type python -A 5 $'CommonTest.skip_dp'

Length of output: 73

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of `CommonTest.skip_dp` across the test suite.

# Test: Search for the usage of `CommonTest.skip_dp`. Expect: Consistent usage across all test files.
rg 'CommonTest.skip_dp' --glob '*.py' -A 5

Length of output: 3182

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of `CommonTest.skip_dp`.

# Search for the definition of `skip_dp` within the `CommonTest` class.
ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'class CommonTest {
  $$$
  skip_dp = $_
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 429

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of `CommonTest.skip_dp`.

# Search for the definition of `skip_dp` within the `CommonTest` class using a corrected pattern.
ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'class CommonTest:\n    $$$\n    skip_dp = $_\n    $$$\n'

Length of output: 88

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for the definition or import of `skip_dp` across the codebase.

# Search for `skip_dp` to locate its definition or any relevant imports.
rg 'skip_dp' -A 5

Length of output: 8578

source/tests/consistent/descriptor/test_se_atten_v2.py (1)

168-168: Verify the updated skip logic in skip_dp.

The change from CommonTest.skip_pt to CommonTest.skip_dp alters the condition under which tests are skipped. Ensure that this change aligns with the intended testing strategy and that CommonTest.skip_dp is correctly implemented across the test suite.

Verification successful

---

Consistent usage of CommonTest.skip_dp across the test suite

The CommonTest.skip_dp flag is consistently used across multiple test files, indicating that the change from CommonTest.skip_pt to CommonTest.skip_dp aligns with the intended testing strategy. If there are specific concerns about its logic or behavior, further manual verification may be required.

• Files using CommonTest.skip_dp:
  • source/tests/consistent/descriptor/test_se_t_tebd.py
  • source/tests/consistent/descriptor/test_dpa2.py
  • source/tests/consistent/descriptor/test_dpa1.py
  • source/tests/consistent/descriptor/test_se_e2_a.py
  • source/tests/consistent/descriptor/test_se_r.py
  • source/tests/consistent/descriptor/test_se_atten_v2.py
  • source/tests/consistent/descriptor/test_se_t.py

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of `CommonTest.skip_dp` across the test suite.

# Test: Search for the usage of `CommonTest.skip_dp`. Expect: Consistent usage across all test files.
rg --type python -A 5 $'CommonTest.skip_dp'

Length of output: 73

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of `CommonTest.skip_dp` across the test suite.

# Test: Search for the usage of `CommonTest.skip_dp`. Expect: Consistent usage across all test files.
rg --type py -A 5 $'CommonTest.skip_dp'

Length of output: 3178

source/tests/consistent/descriptor/test_dpa1.py (1)

180-180: Verify the updated skip logic in skip_dp.

The change from CommonTest.skip_pt to CommonTest.skip_dp alters the condition under which tests are skipped. Ensure that this change aligns with the intended testing strategy and that CommonTest.skip_dp is correctly implemented across the test suite.

source/tests/consistent/descriptor/test_dpa2.py (1)

238-238: Review of skip_dp method change.

The modification in the skip_dp method to return CommonTest.skip_dp instead of CommonTest.skip_pt is aligned with the PR objectives. This change is crucial as it affects the logic determining whether specific tests should be skipped based on the new flag.

Verification Needed:
Ensure that all references and dependencies related to the skip_dp and skip_pt methods within the test suite are updated to reflect this change. This is to prevent any inconsistencies or unintended behavior during test execution.

Verification successful

---

Verification Successful: Consistent Usage of skip_dp and skip_pt

The modification in the skip_dp method to return CommonTest.skip_dp instead of CommonTest.skip_pt is consistent across the codebase. All references and dependencies related to these methods are aligned with the new logic, ensuring no inconsistencies or unintended behavior during test execution.

• The change aligns with the intended behavior and objectives of the PR.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all references to `skip_dp` and `skip_pt` are consistent with the new logic.

# Test: Search for references to `skip_dp` and `skip_pt`. Expect: Consistent usage aligned with the new logic.
rg --type python -A 5 $'skip_dp|skip_pt'

Length of output: 72

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all references to `skip_dp` and `skip_pt` are consistent with the new logic.

# Test: Search for references to `skip_dp` and `skip_pt`. Expect: Consistent usage aligned with the new logic.
rg --type py -A 5 $'skip_dp|skip_pt'

Length of output: 19582

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.01%. Comparing base (c3ba728) to head (f07c5da).
Report is 1 commits behind head on devel.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #4111      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.02%   83.01%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         532      532              
  Lines       52164    52164              
  Branches     3030     3030              
==========================================
- Hits        43308    43305       -3     
- Misses       7910     7912       +2     
- Partials      946      947       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.