Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pt: make jit happy with torch 2.0.0 #3443

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 11, 2024

Conversation

njzjz
Copy link
Member

@njzjz njzjz commented Mar 11, 2024

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <jinzhe.zeng@rutgers.edu>
@njzjz njzjz requested review from iProzd and anyangml March 11, 2024 04:43
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.36%. Comparing base (804848a) to head (c0eaa2b).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #3443      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   77.39%   77.36%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         427      427              
  Lines       36755    36759       +4     
  Branches     1621     1621              
==========================================
- Hits        28446    28439       -7     
- Misses       7441     7452      +11     
  Partials      868      868              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@anyangml
Copy link
Collaborator

It works now at least.

@njzjz
Copy link
Member Author

njzjz commented Mar 11, 2024

#3444 should fix the CI issue

@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 11, 2024
Merged via the queue into deepmodeling:devel with commit b544885 Mar 11, 2024
48 checks passed
@njzjz njzjz mentioned this pull request Apr 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants