Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Feature request] Roadmap for PyTorch backend #3122

Closed
6 of 7 tasks
njzjz opened this issue Jan 9, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed
6 of 7 tasks

[Feature request] Roadmap for PyTorch backend #3122

njzjz opened this issue Jan 9, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement
Milestone
v3.0.0

Comments

@njzjz
Copy link
Member

njzjz commented Jan 9, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Summary

This issue is a roadmap to migrate the PyTorch (PT) backend from the temporary repository to here.

Detailed Description

Further Information, Files, and Links

No response
@njzjz njzjz added this to the v3.0.0 milestone Jan 9, 2024
@njzjz njzjz mentioned this issue Jan 12, 2024
Merged
wanghan-iapcm pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 12, 2024
@njzjz
cc: refactor DeepPotModelDevi, making it framework-independent (#3134)
828df66 
Refactor `DeepPotModelDevi` as a step of #3122. Now, it is just a
wrapper of multiple `DeepPot` classes. Models can have different
behaviors inside different `DeepPot`.

One may argue that the new class needs to prepare the input multiple
times. However, it's not expensive only to copy the memory. Also, during
the simulations, usually we run it every 100 steps.
@iProzd
Copy link
Collaborator

iProzd commented May 1, 2024

Use project https://github.com/orgs/deepmodeling/projects/19 to track.

@iProzd iProzd closed this as completed May 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement
Projects
Multiple backend support for DeePMD-kit
Archived in project
DeePMD-3.0.0 beta release
Archived in project
Milestone
v3.0.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@njzjz @iProzd