【6.9】飞腾 GMAC 驱动 phytmac_validate() 函数依赖已移除的 .validate() 方式 #4
Comments
|
目前已通过回滚移除 |
Closed
|
acked |
MingcongBai
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 1, 2024
[ Upstream commit f1e197a ] trace_drop_common() is called with preemption disabled, and it acquires a spin_lock. This is problematic for RT kernels because spin_locks are sleeping locks in this configuration, which causes the following splat: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 449, name: rcuc/47 preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 RCU nest depth: 2, expected: 2 5 locks held by rcuc/47/449: #0: ff1100086ec30a60 ((softirq_ctrl.lock)){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: __local_bh_disable_ip+0x105/0x210 #1: ffffffffb394a280 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rt_spin_lock+0xbf/0x130 #2: ffffffffb394a280 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __local_bh_disable_ip+0x11c/0x210 #3: ffffffffb394a160 (rcu_callback){....}-{0:0}, at: rcu_do_batch+0x360/0xc70 #4: ff1100086ee07520 (&data->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: trace_drop_common.constprop.0+0xb5/0x290 irq event stamp: 139909 hardirqs last enabled at (139908): [<ffffffffb1df2b33>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x63/0x80 hardirqs last disabled at (139909): [<ffffffffb19bd03d>] trace_drop_common.constprop.0+0x26d/0x290 softirqs last enabled at (139892): [<ffffffffb07a1083>] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x103/0x170 softirqs last disabled at (139898): [<ffffffffb0909b33>] rcu_cpu_kthread+0x93/0x1f0 Preemption disabled at: [<ffffffffb1de786b>] rt_mutex_slowunlock+0xab/0x2e0 CPU: 47 PID: 449 Comm: rcuc/47 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc2-rt1+ #7 Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R650/0Y2G81, BIOS 1.6.5 04/15/2022 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x8c/0xd0 dump_stack+0x14/0x20 __might_resched+0x21e/0x2f0 rt_spin_lock+0x5e/0x130 ? trace_drop_common.constprop.0+0xb5/0x290 ? skb_queue_purge_reason.part.0+0x1bf/0x230 trace_drop_common.constprop.0+0xb5/0x290 ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4a/0x80 ? __pfx_trace_drop_common.constprop.0+0x10/0x10 ? rt_mutex_slowunlock+0x26a/0x2e0 ? skb_queue_purge_reason.part.0+0x1bf/0x230 ? __pfx_rt_mutex_slowunlock+0x10/0x10 ? skb_queue_purge_reason.part.0+0x1bf/0x230 trace_kfree_skb_hit+0x15/0x20 trace_kfree_skb+0xe9/0x150 kfree_skb_reason+0x7b/0x110 skb_queue_purge_reason.part.0+0x1bf/0x230 ? __pfx_skb_queue_purge_reason.part.0+0x10/0x10 ? mark_lock.part.0+0x8a/0x520 ... trace_drop_common() also disables interrupts, but this is a minor issue because we could easily replace it with a local_lock. Replace the spin_lock with raw_spin_lock to avoid sleeping in atomic context. Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@redhat.com> Reported-by: Hu Chunyu <chuhu@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
MingcongBai
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 1, 2024
[ Upstream commit af0cb3f ] Xiumei and Christoph reported the following lockdep splat, complaining of the qdisc root lock being taken twice: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.7.0-rc3+ torvalds#598 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- swapper/2/0 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888177190110 (&sch->q.lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1560/0x2e70 but task is already holding lock: ffff88811995a110 (&sch->q.lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1560/0x2e70 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&sch->q.lock); lock(&sch->q.lock); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 5 locks held by swapper/2/0: #0: ffff888135a09d98 ((&in_dev->mr_ifc_timer)){+.-.}-{0:0}, at: call_timer_fn+0x11a/0x510 #1: ffffffffaaee5260 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x2c0/0x1ed0 #2: ffffffffaaee5200 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x209/0x2e70 #3: ffff88811995a110 (&sch->q.lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1560/0x2e70 #4: ffffffffaaee5200 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x209/0x2e70 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/2 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc3+ torvalds#598 Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 1.13.0-2.module+el8.3.0+7353+9de0a3cc 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl+0x4a/0x80 __lock_acquire+0xfdd/0x3150 lock_acquire+0x1ca/0x540 _raw_spin_lock+0x34/0x80 __dev_queue_xmit+0x1560/0x2e70 tcf_mirred_act+0x82e/0x1260 [act_mirred] tcf_action_exec+0x161/0x480 tcf_classify+0x689/0x1170 prio_enqueue+0x316/0x660 [sch_prio] dev_qdisc_enqueue+0x46/0x220 __dev_queue_xmit+0x1615/0x2e70 ip_finish_output2+0x1218/0x1ed0 __ip_finish_output+0x8b3/0x1350 ip_output+0x163/0x4e0 igmp_ifc_timer_expire+0x44b/0x930 call_timer_fn+0x1a2/0x510 run_timer_softirq+0x54d/0x11a0 __do_softirq+0x1b3/0x88f irq_exit_rcu+0x18f/0x1e0 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6f/0x90 </IRQ> This happens when TC does a mirred egress redirect from the root qdisc of device A to the root qdisc of device B. As long as these two locks aren't protecting the same qdisc, they can be acquired in chain: add a per-qdisc lockdep key to silence false warnings. This dynamic key should safely replace the static key we have in sch_htb: it was added to allow enqueueing to the device "direct qdisc" while still holding the qdisc root lock. v2: don't use static keys anymore in HTB direct qdiscs (thanks Eric Dumazet) CC: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maxim@isovalent.com> CC: Xiumei Mu <xmu@redhat.com> Reported-by: Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@apple.com> Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#451 Signed-off-by: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7dc06d6158f72053cf877a82e2a7a5bd23692faa.1713448007.git.dcaratti@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
MingcongBai
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 1, 2024
[ Upstream commit cebae29 ] Shin'ichiro reported that when he's running fstests' test-case btrfs/167 on emulated zoned devices, he's seeing the following NULL pointer dereference in 'btrfs_zone_finish_endio()': Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000011: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000088-0x000000000000008f] CPU: 4 PID: 2332440 Comm: kworker/u80:15 Tainted: G W 6.10.0-rc2-kts+ #4 Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/X11SPi-TF, BIOS 3.3 02/21/2020 Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] RIP: 0010:btrfs_zone_finish_endio.part.0+0x34/0x160 [btrfs] RSP: 0018:ffff88867f107a90 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffffff893e5534 RDX: 0000000000000011 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 0000000000000088 RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed1081696028 R10: ffff88840b4b0143 R11: ffff88834dfff600 R12: ffff88840b4b0000 R13: 0000000000020000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff888530ad5210 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888e3f800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f87223fff38 CR3: 00000007a7c6a002 CR4: 00000000007706f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x27 ? die_addr+0x46/0x70 ? exc_general_protection+0x14f/0x250 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? do_raw_read_unlock+0x44/0x70 ? btrfs_zone_finish_endio.part.0+0x34/0x160 [btrfs] btrfs_finish_one_ordered+0x5d9/0x19a0 [btrfs] ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10 ? do_raw_write_lock+0x90/0x260 ? __pfx_do_raw_write_lock+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_btrfs_finish_one_ordered+0x10/0x10 [btrfs] ? _raw_write_unlock+0x23/0x40 ? btrfs_finish_ordered_zoned+0x5a9/0x850 [btrfs] ? lock_acquire+0x435/0x500 btrfs_work_helper+0x1b1/0xa70 [btrfs] ? __schedule+0x10a8/0x60b0 ? __pfx___might_resched+0x10/0x10 process_one_work+0x862/0x1410 ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_process_one_work+0x10/0x10 ? assign_work+0x16c/0x240 worker_thread+0x5e6/0x1010 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0x2c3/0x3a0 ? trace_irq_enable.constprop.0+0xce/0x110 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x70 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK> Enabling CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT revealed the following assertion to trigger: assertion failed: !list_empty(&ordered->list), in fs/btrfs/zoned.c:1815 This indicates, that we're missing the checksums list on the ordered_extent. As btrfs/167 is doing a NOCOW write this is to be expected. Further analysis with drgn confirmed the assumption: >>> inode = prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[11]['ordered'].inode >>> btrfs_inode = drgn.container_of(inode, "struct btrfs_inode", \ "vfs_inode") >>> print(btrfs_inode.flags) (u32)1 As zoned emulation mode simulates conventional zones on regular devices, we cannot use zone-append for writing. But we're only attaching dummy checksums if we're doing a zone-append write. So for NOCOW zoned data writes on conventional zones, also attach a dummy checksum. Reported-by: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Fixes: cbfce4c ("btrfs: optimize the logical to physical mapping for zoned writes") CC: Naohiro Aota <Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com> # 6.6+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
MingcongBai
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 18, 2024
When CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS and CONFIG_KASAN_STACK are enabled, the object_is_on_stack() function may produce incorrect results due to the presence of tags in the obj pointer, while the stack pointer does not have tags. This discrepancy can lead to incorrect stack object detection and subsequently trigger warnings if CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS is also enabled. Example of the warning: ODEBUG: object 3eff800082ea7bb0 is NOT on stack ffff800082ea0000, but annotated. ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at lib/debugobjects.c:557 __debug_object_init+0x330/0x364 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5 #4 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) pstate: 600000c5 (nZCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : __debug_object_init+0x330/0x364 lr : __debug_object_init+0x330/0x364 sp : ffff800082ea7b40 x29: ffff800082ea7b40 x28: 98ff0000c0164518 x27: 98ff0000c0164534 x26: ffff800082d93ec8 x25: 0000000000000001 x24: 1cff0000c00172a0 x23: 0000000000000000 x22: ffff800082d93ed0 x21: ffff800081a24418 x20: 3eff800082ea7bb0 x19: efff800000000000 x18: 0000000000000000 x17: 00000000000000ff x16: 0000000000000047 x15: 206b63617473206e x14: 0000000000000018 x13: ffff800082ea7780 x12: 0ffff800082ea78e x11: 0ffff800082ea790 x10: 0ffff800082ea79d x9 : 34d77febe173e800 x8 : 34d77febe173e800 x7 : 0000000000000001 x6 : 0000000000000001 x5 : feff800082ea74b8 x4 : ffff800082870a90 x3 : ffff80008018d3c4 x2 : 0000000000000001 x1 : ffff800082858810 x0 : 0000000000000050 Call trace: __debug_object_init+0x330/0x364 debug_object_init_on_stack+0x30/0x3c schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock+0xac/0x26c schedule_hrtimeout+0x1c/0x30 wait_task_inactive+0x1d4/0x25c kthread_bind_mask+0x28/0x98 init_rescuer+0x1e8/0x280 workqueue_init+0x1a0/0x3cc kernel_init_freeable+0x118/0x200 kernel_init+0x28/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- ODEBUG: object 3eff800082ea7bb0 is NOT on stack ffff800082ea0000, but annotated. ------------[ cut here ]------------ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241113042544.19095-1-qun-wei.lin@mediatek.com Signed-off-by: Qun-Wei Lin <qun-wei.lin@mediatek.com> Cc: Andrew Yang <andrew.yang@mediatek.com> Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> Cc: Casper Li <casper.li@mediatek.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev> Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> Cc: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
针对 6.9 修缮代码后，发现
drivers/net/ethernet/phytium/phytmac_main.c文件中依然在使用上游已经移除的方式且phytmac_validate()需适配后续引入的.mac_get_caps()方式详见：
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: